Is it possible to speak objectively about Adolf Hitler?
Well, I think it is increasingly necessary, however difficult, because our enemies have
programmed us to think that Hitler is the embodiment of evil, and that anyone who attempts to make
an objective assessment is themselves a Hitlerite, a Nazi, and they're just dying to commit genocide.
So if you're a little bit anxious when you hear me say, I want to ask, what is the greatest thing that Adolf Hitler ever did?
And what was really the final solution? And what was perhaps the biggest mistake he ever made as a political leader?
This feeling to put it mildly of apprehension to discuss these matters is planted into us by our enemies with decades of brainwashing.
And there are two key reasons for this. The active reason is so that the enemies of mankind can label anyone else as the next Hitler.
This is supposed to give the pretext for destroying that person and their country.
For example, you call Saddam Hussein the next Hitler, and Rek Iraq, or you call Qaddafi the next Hitler, and level Libya.
Or you say Assad is another Hitler, so that you can savage Syria.
And for years we've been hearing people say Vladimir Putin is the next Hitler.
Do you see him more as a Hitler or as a Stalin?
Well, I think he's more of a Hitler.
And the mendacity of all this is not just that none of these leaders are like this monstrous Hitler we've been told about, but neither was Hitler himself.
Then the negative or passive reason for this propaganda is because they're trying to hide something.
They don't want us to find out what Hitler really did, because there are a couple of policies of his which I'll come to in this video, which are absolutely needed today.
And then by analyzing what I think was one of his greatest mistakes, we can hopefully shut down any temptation that some people have to repeat that very mistake.
Now to any of us, but especially to Catholics, it should be immediately suspicious if any human being is held up to be absolute evil.
But when it comes to the good, we know that there were two persons on this earth who were absolutely without sin.
Our Lord Jesus Christ, because he is the Son of God, and the Blessed Virgin Mary, because she was immaculately conceived, and she never sinned.
At the other end of the spectrum, there are two persons who are exceedingly malevolent, but we cannot call them absolutely evil.
One of them is Satan, the devil.
Now his will is turned totally against God, and in this sense he is completely corrupted in his will. His whole desire is evil.
But in himself, in his being, he is ontologically good. He was made good by God, and insofar as he exists, his being is good.
With the Antichrist, who will be the human being who is most given over to Satan, we can anticipate also that his will will be completely corrupt, total rebellion against God.
And yet again ontologically in his being there is goodness. He was made in the image of God having reason and free will.
But he himself has given this over to complete darkness.
Every other human being falls between these extremes of good and evil.
So if we take a closer look at Adolf Hitler, there are quite a lot of surprises.
I will mention two good policies of his, so very good that I believe we need them today.
Then evil policies of his, which is so bad that I could never sign up to the Nazi program.
And finally at an outstanding policy of his, which makes him one of the greatest political leaders of the last century.
But in Hitler's manner of executing it, I believe he made a colossal mistake.
And I hope no one will ever try to do it again. It's in regard to the final solution.
But the final solution is not what most people think that it is.
To anticipate that section of the video, do you believe that the final solution was forced deportation to Madagascar?
Or was it expedited emigration to Palestine?
Or was it expulsion eastward from the Reich into former Soviet territories?
Or lastly, was it mass murder, gas chambers, genocide?
The correct answer is Madagascar.
And then Palestine.
And then forced expulsion eastwards.
These three were successive variants of the so-called final solution.
It was never genocide. There were no gas chambers.
And to be convinced of that, I can recommend to you this series of books, the Holocaust Handbooks,
which are probably the best research in the world into that subject.
And they don't leave the received narrative with a leg to stand on.
Or if you're not so much into reading, you could view some of these videos on this rumble channel.
And I hope at least they convinced you to have an open mind and to start from scratch with the whole subject.
With all that said, we come to the first very important policy of Adolf Hitler,
which I believe we need the like of it today, namely that he nationalized the Central Bank.
Here's a report from the 3rd of May 1933 on the website of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum.
And the effect of this was that the interest payments on the national debt were no longer going to foreigners,
to the bankers, to Jews, but going back into the country itself.
And this is why within a couple of years of being elected to office, it solved the crisis in homelessness.
And 6 million unemployed people found jobs.
There's much more to being a national leader than economics,
but clearly having a roof of your head or being able to feed your family is itself much more than economics.
The people who hate Hitler with every fiber of their being will protest that he didn't nationalize the Central Bank.
He privatized it. It went to his Nazi cronies. Others will say it was still in the hands of the Jews.
In fact, some of these people say Hitler himself was Jewish.
There's so much misinformation and misdirection, just so we don't get to the truth of it.
But the point of nationalizing the central banks is not merely that you spare your nation those huge interest payments on a deliberately inflated debt,
but that you're no longer paying these countless millions to the enemies of the country, to men who want to destroy your country.
This is the tragedy of inescapable debt.
It's not enough for them, the usurers, the moneylenders to get individuals and families into debt.
They get whole nations into debt, designed to keep them in it.
And from the very profits of the people's labor, they then aim to destroy the people so they can control all.
And if you're not convinced by this, how is it that Germany's economy was turned around so quickly, so effectively?
Most of us have seen images of the Weimar Republic, where one would need a wheelbarrow full of papier mark in order to buy a loaf of bread.
Children played with the currency like building blocks.
Yet within a decade or two of that, Germany became this powerhouse, this formidable nation able to take on half the world.
Now please God, we will use our wealth for peaceful purposes.
But we will remain enslaved so long as the Bank of England is only superficially nationalized rather than properly nationalized.
As ever, it exists to serve the interests of bankers rather than the whole nation.
In a more obvious way, America's Federal Reserve is in private hands.
But when central banks are nationalized, there is no need for them to make huge profits, because it all goes back to the nation anyway.
Then the people can enjoy the fruits of their labors.
If you work hard on any project for five years, you're going to see a good deal of progress.
Imagine when a whole village works hard in cooperation.
In five years it will make a massive difference.
And what is that then for a whole nation?
When they don't have to give a decisive cut of the fruits of their labor to their enemies, to people who have contempt for them.
And I believe it's because of the independence of their central bank from the international system that Saddam Hussein was targeted.
And then Gaddafi.
Though the great Israel project wants all these countries in chaos,
they're content to have a non-violent relationship like with Saudi Arabia if they're integrated into the Jewish financial system.
The second laudable policy of the Nazis I'd like to bring up here was the book burning.
We're told that this was against freedom of speech and measure of tyranny.
That's not the case. What they were burning was pornography.
Materials subversive to human nature and human society.
This video looks at three Jews who were leading figures in the sexual, philosophical and spiritual derangement which swamped Berlin through the 1920s up until Hitler came to power.
Namely Magnus Hirschfeld, Felix Teilhaber and Wilhelm Reich.
The Nazis targeted their works in particular including literary, lobbying and surgical efforts to promote transvestitism.
The Nazis also burnt books of secret societies and those promoting revolution and communism.
Because they had such a close eye on Bolshevik Russia, they could see how this meant the death of a nation.
Today we should make pornography illegal so that those who produce it are prosecuted.
We should make transgender surgery illegal so that those who perform it, especially on children, go straight to prison.
For communism it should just be exposed for the godless evil that it is and if the church would step up to the plate and condemn it as she used to,
then there's much more chance for politicians and philosophers to do likewise if the Jews don't own the media and the universities
so that people have enough objective information to reject it for themselves.
These are not incidental points. The enemies of the state seek to stoke perversion and revolution because they hate order.
They hate the Christian order and speaking of which now come to a wicked policy of the Nazis which was euthanasia.
Basically the state sponsored killing of the disabled or the mentally ill which nobody has a right to do.
It is God who gives life and God who deems when it will be taken away. No one can arrogate that to themselves.
If there is a death penalty as part of the criminal justice system that has to be on God's terms.
And for this reason alone euthanasia had I been around at the time I would have come into conflict with the Nazis.
There was a sizable number of Roman Catholic priests who were sent to the concentration camps including many who died there.
Some of these might have been communist subversives but that cannot be said of Saint Maximilian Colbe.
He was no Freemason, no communist.
Addressing the Nazi opposition to the Catholic Church, Pope Pius XI wrote an encyclical in 1937,
which was read from pulpits all across Germany on Palm Sunday when the churches were packed.
The Pope commended the priests and religious who had been imprisoned in the concentration camps.
He condemned the systematic hostility against the church including against Catholic schools in violation of the 1933 Reich's Concordat.
He condemned attempts to banish the Old Testament in schools as a blasphemous rejection of Jesus Christ.
He lamented that children were compelled to take part in sports to the point of obstructing Sunday worship against the best German traditions.
We do similarly today.
The Pope comforted Catholic parents who were denied a free vote on their children's education.
He protested that organizations like the Hitler Youth were demanding a devotion to the state that belonged to God,
noting that however noble the race or the state they are not above God who planned them.
Therefore, aggressive paganism and any other system which seeks to compete with Jesus Christ comes to nothing.
God shall laugh at them.
Hence, many of us Catholics and others are averse to Adolf Hitler because of his quasi-religious exaltation,
for example at these huge rallies which entail the reduction of the people to a mass.
Now, there's nothing wrong with massive crowds turning out to greet or cheer their monarch, their king, their leader,
and the Germans had many reasons to love Hitler, but the uniformity of it strikes me as totalitarian.
And the labour corps armed with spades.
As they march towards the camera and swing right, watch the sun glint on bright steel.
Personality is lost. That should be obvious to us just by looking at the footage,
but you can also read plenty of cases of people who were ostracized
but not going along with this semi-idolatory.
So these mass rallies, maybe it suits some cultures but I doubt it very much
and at least the English sensibility recoils from it.
And again, it's good when you can love your queen or your king or your president
but these regimented displays do not look at all healthy to me.
I would hate to have been there.
And now we come to what was one of the greatest policies that Adolf Hitler had
which also involves what I think is one of his greatest mistakes
and it is also the final solution itself.
I hope it is obvious that the final solution was not genocide.
The euthanasia is wrong because it's murder.
How much more grotesque is mass murder
and absolutely evil would be a planned genocide against anyone
and it shouldn't need saying.
But the plan to deport Jews to Madagascar, although it came to nothing
is significant as part of a solidly documented paradigm of emigration
and subsequently evacuation eastwards
as the actual solution that the Nazis implemented for the Jewish problem.
The next video in this series, that is part two about the final solution
will examine historical sources and mainstream references
which show this foundational paradigm is solidly documented
and moreover that it supports a common sense development
that ran through the entire course of the war
and which crucially leaves no room for the initiation of a genocidal program of extermination.
But before we come to the documents
I want to give reasons why nobody who understands how serious the Jewish problem is today
should imagine that forced expulsions are a solution.
They do not solve the problem but at best only relocate and postpone it.
To begin with, sending Jews to Madagascar would have been absolutely unfair
on the indigenous population.
Why should they have to receive all these Jews?
And the same is true of Zionism.
The Zionists and the Nazis collaborated to help tens of thousands of Jews
emigrate to Palestine and what a misery that has caused
for the Palestinians and the neighbouring countries.
The ultimate phase of the final solution was the forced expulsion of Jews
out eastward from the German Reich into Poland
and then from Poland into the former Soviet territories.
Today would say the Baltic states, Belarus, Ukraine.
The reason I believe this makes Adolf Hitler one of the greatest political leaders of the last century
is that he actually tried to address the Jewish question.
Now, I think the policy he resorted to of expulsions is a profound mistake.
We'll come to that.
But he put so much of the national resources
and took on massive international risk to get this done
to protect his people from the Jews in complete contrast with Churchill
who, though he grew up and was hostile to the Jews
from the brink of bankruptcy he was rehabilitated by the focus group
mostly Jewish businessmen and after that he was forever in the service of Zionism
and betrayed England and Great Britain for the Jewish cause.
Likewise Roosevelt bringing America into World War II to serve the Jews.
There's plenty of material online from contemporary sources
if you're not yet convinced of that.
Finally, before I come to the video where I want to show documents
and historical references to back up these points
is why I think the expulsion is a mistake.
It's not only that it's completely unfair on the recipient nations
to have to take these Jews and not only because it's counterproductive
because the Jews don't forget they have enough contempt for Gentiles as it is
but they believe their own propaganda and they want revenge
and if they go to another country they will remember for generations and generations
to seek revenge as those Jews expelled from Spain in 1492
went to Holland and England and for centuries reaped their revenge on Spain
and how Jews who went from Germany to America or Palestine
have achieved a frightening subjection of Germany since then
and they will use any powerful nation to do this
they use England or America, use our money, use our men, use our blood
to reap their revenge on the world
but the deeper reason that expulsions are wrong
is that God himself wants us to overcome the Jewish evil
through charity, through love, through self-sacrifice
and if anyone argues with that let them just look at the crucifixion
or let them look at St Stephen the First Martyr
that if you even dream or think about hurting the Jews unfairly
or, I hate to say it, killing them as some people do
and some people speak of that still today
you're going right up against God
and Cain who represents the Jews after murdering his brother Abel
who represents Jesus Christ or the church
Cain complained that people would be after him
they would seek to kill him and God said not so
whoever lays a finger on Cain, God himself
will wreak a seven-fold punishment on them
because vengeance is the Lord's, not ours
we can seek justice, it is justice to remove the Jews
from all positions of power and influence in your society
because they are only going to corrupt it
and take over to enslave
so it's justice to deny them this power
but then to go on to hurt them, to persecute them
to damage their synagogues or desecrate their graveyards
this is unjust, it's evil
and God will not stand for it
Psalm 58 as well the church fathers tell us again
is do not harm the Jews
slay them not
but God has his reasons of preserving them right into the end
they will be key in defeating the Antichrist
and that's just one of the reasons why God will not allow anybody
to commit a genocide against the Jews
but if you will protect them from harm
within your society
even protect your enemy from harm
then you become perfect in charity
and this is God's aim with us
first you have to grow in virtue
because when the users try to tempt you with a loan
you have to reject it
never seeking to go into debt to usurus
this doesn't mean that a society can't raise capital
for huge enterprises
it can but the risk of those projects
needs to be shared by everyone who puts the money in
but a society and especially the businessmen
and the politically powerful and the princes
who reject usury always
that is a very healthy society
just as a society rejects pornography
you know porn hub is owned by a rabbi
but I think the biggest four porn providers in the world
are all owned by Jews
they do this because they don't have a clue who they are
an identity crisis like no one else
they don't know who they are and they're searching
and that's why we get this garbage about
people searching for their sexual identity
this whole spectrum of different genders
they're lost because they were the chosen people
chosen by God to welcome the Messiah into this world
in the flesh and since Jesus came
and kaya fastened the Jews with him
called for his crucifixion
they no longer know who they are
but the apostles and Jesus disciples
know exactly who they are
and Christians in any nation know who they are
you are the elect of God
you are the chosen nation of God
they're baptised
you grow up, you know your family
you know your country, you know your religion
there's no great crisis of identity
but the Jews will never find an identity
that gives them peace
that fulfills them until they repent
and convert to Jesus Christ
the Messiah, the Son of God
a nation that affords them that opportunity
by taking none of their temptations to sin
through money, through pornography
through their incessant warmongering
which falls for none of their insane philosophies
and yet protects them and prays for their conversion
the Jews needn't be a political threat to anyone
if we don't give them power
they're not going to undermine the culture
if we don't give them influence
it's up to us
that makes us strong, balanced
and then to pray for your enemies
to love them, to desire their conversion
this is the holiness that God wants of us
and so whatever nation in the world
you have a certain population of Jews
that's your burden from God
don't expel them
now it's true that the Jews
have been expelled hundreds of times through history
there's at least 110 places documented
where this has happened
this is because we're in an imperfect world
with imperfect populations
under imperfect leaders
and we're trying to figure things out
but sometimes things get so critical
and the leaders so exasperated
that they resort to the expulsion of the Jews
this is what Hitler did
maybe as a political leader
he did not see a way to strip the Jews of power
yet to leave them protected inside Germany
instead he resorted to encouraging emigration
then expulsions
and forced evacuations
even if one claims this was self-defense
it is wrong-headed
by 1942 the German Reich realised
that helping Jews to emigrate
gave them a chance to work with the Allies
for example in intelligence operations
as being perfect German speakers
they could help with intercepts
and with propaganda
and then after forcibly evacuating many Jews out east
some of these hurt the Germans behind their front line
by supporting the partisans
and when the war turned
and the Soviets began advancing
they found themselves bringing Jews back westwards
as they wished to keep their labour force
but in the end they even gave Jews the choice
whether they wanted to march west
or stay and await the Soviet takeover
large numbers chose to return to the Reich
minus of course all those who had died in the camps
whether of sickness, neglect or maltreatment
and the many who had died on the transports
were executed including the large numbers
who were shot in reprisals
for suspected support for partisans
this coldness of heart would be the Nazis downfall
the Jewish problem
though it have social, economic and geopolitical consequences
is nevertheless at root spiritual
there can be no victory over hardness of hearts
by allowing one's own heart to grow blind to Jesus Christ
so the Germans would have been better off
if they had never displaced a single Jew
from Germany, Austria or elsewhere
politics is the art of the possible
and it's up to the political leader to discern that
the church's job is to teach these eternal truths and principles
that will inform politics as to what ultimately can work
the Jews had already pretty much destroyed Germany
in the decades leading up to the 1920s
it was Hitler who turned that around
but the policies of expulsion I believe were a catastrophe
and it's not what God wants from us
it's not a future solution
but to reach for that we need much more from the church
just as the various nations have been undermined
and corrupted and enslaved by the Jews
so also they've had a very malevolent influence on the church
on her liturgy and her dogma on her morals
they will not prevail
but the church must be herself again
and be a light to the world
and this will show the way for the political leaders
all that I'll come to, God willing
in future videos in this series
the first of which will be part 2 to this video
which will examine historical sources and documentation
as the basis of the arguments made here
it will include looking at difficult passages
such as in the Vance protocol
and at Heinrich Himmler's shocking pose and speeches
in the end though there is only one reality
God bless you all