Hello everybody and welcome to patriotic weekly review episode number 307 and we're live tonight on odyssey d live rumble and entropy and because I'm banned from everywhere except for telegram and gab
Please do give this show a little share if you can because I struggle to share it
outside of those platforms. So if you can do that, that would be greatly appreciated. So if
you're on X, if you're on Facebook, if you're on Instagram, if you're on any of the places
which I'm permanently banned from, thanks to the UK government and the home office,
please do help the word spread. And we've got a great guest for you tonight who you will see here
on the screen now and I'll be introducing him shortly. But before I do that, I'll just tell
Friday, I will be back with David Duke at 4 p.m. On Friday. I'll also be producing which I'm currently writing and editing at the moment
But it's a pre-recorded video about the situation Marine Le Pen has faced and that's gonna be quite interesting
Because I've talked about other groups that have either faced bans or candidates that have faced being barred who have actually had major
parliamentary representation in Europe and it's basically about democracy and how democracy
is nothing but an illusion and if the people vote for the wrong candidate it's like going
into the casino and thinking you're going to win. The game is rigged and it's very hard to
Win even if you do sell out such as Marine Le Pen has so that'll be out on Friday at the usual time
Then on Sunday, we'll be back for the Nationalist 18 myself Patriot and Natty will be live here on Odyssey at 7 p.m
So there's all that to look forward to later in the week and finally
if you want to contribute to this stream, if you want to ask a question, if you want to make a point,
or if you want to just donate, please do send a super chat, you can still do that via Odyssey,
you can also do that on Rumble, and you can do it through Entropy. All the links are there for you
to do that. And if you want to send something, three dollars, five dollars, ten dollars, whatever
you can afford, it would be greatly appreciated because that is the way I keep my head above water,
generate income via having some website where I can take memberships or
anything like that I don't do that everything that I earn is done through
these streams so if you could please consider giving a small donation that
would be greatly appreciated and any questions to myself
or to Ronunds will be put to us both in the second hour of the show. Now, you can also
send money via cryptocurrency. All the crypto links are in the description below. You can give
via Bitcoin, Bitcoin, Cashmere, and if you don't see the crypto you want to donate in,
you can always send me an email. And anyone can send me an email at mark at thefallofwesterman.com.
You can contact me there if you need help, if you need advice, or if you've got feedback
about the show, or if you'd like to get involved in any form of real life activism.
That's it, really. That's everything I've got to announce for today.
So let's get straight into the show, because I'm really looking forward to this.
Obviously, the guest you've seen, it's Ron Hans.
Ron Hans is a fantastic gentleman, and he does some amazing work
exposing Zionist power, the state of Israel,
and how the state of Israel controls Western nations, such as America.
He's got an incredible website, and he's sort of...
If he doesn't mind me saying, he's kind of like the Marvel comics of nationalism.
He's sort of assembled the Avengers of nationalism.
He's got everyone he's writing for Ron Unns on The Unns Report.
It's fantastic. He's got Jared Taylor.
He's got Andrew Anglin. He's had Keith Woods on there.
E. Michael Jones.
all of the people you can imagine write articles on his site and it is one of the best read
sites on the whole internet that covers a range of issues pertaining to Israel and Zionism.
So I'm really looking forward to this show tonight and it's a real real honor to have him here with
us. I've never written for a site but I'm speaking to him for the show and I'm going to submit some
Because it is a it would be a real honor to be published there amongst the people who he has writing for irregularly anyway without further ado
I'm gonna say good evening Tim and say Ron
Would you like to introduce yourself give us a little bit of background and just basically say hello to the viewers?
Sure. Well my original background my was in theoretical physics in other words
That was my original academic background, but then about almost 40 years ago
I ended up taking a sort of different turn and leaving graduate school and actually going
to work in financial services software.
And I was doing that for a number of years, and then after a while, after I moved back to California, I got much more involved in politics and public policy,
which were areas I'd always been interested in. In other words, I did a number of initiative campaigns and things like that.
And then probably the last 20 years or so, I've mostly been involved in research and writing.
and publications and for a while i was actually the publisher of the american conservative magazine but then about a dozen years ago i ended up setting up my own website the ans review.
Which is sort of originally viewed as sort of a venue for my possible venue for my own writings.
but its orientation is essentially a mixture of those ideas, interesting, controversial,
and important ideas that are excluded from the mainstream media. So in other words, we have
left-wing writers, right-wing writers, conspiracy writers, racialists, writers, libertarians.
It's pretty much a range of all those writers and ideas whose views are simply too controversial to
And, you know, as the years have gone by, the provisions of the mainstream media have tightened
more and more, excluding more and more writers. So in other words, you know, the sort of coverage
we have is probably, in a sense, grown as the coverage of the mainstream media is reduced.
Now, for the last seven or eight years, I've been very heavily involved in my own writing,
on really a lot of those historical incidents and episodes in American history over the last
hundred or hundred and fifty years that I've discovered were very different than what the
mainstream media or my college textbooks had reported. In other words, so much of what I'd
believed about the history of the Western world over the last century or more was very different
And that related a little bit to a project I'd started about 20, 25 years ago, which
was the idea of digitizing the archives of many of the most prestigious mainstream publications
in American history, you know, for example, the New Republic, the nation, I mean, the
So the whole thing about it is as I started digitizing these older publications in America,
you know, very mainstream elite publications, I gradually discovered that what they said
about the events of the time were very, very different than what I ever believed them to be.
So in other words, when you're reading headlines in the newspapers or magazines of something from
Fifty or eighty or a hundred years ago that were totally different than what you'd always been told had happened in your
College textbooks or in the media you start to be so become much more suspicious about other events
And that really was the basis of my American prom to series
Which is now grown to probably close to a million words and well over a hundred different articles
So, you know, that's pretty much what I've been doing in other words
Investigating and writing many of the major historical events of the last hundred years and in many cases discovering they're very different than what most Americans probably believe them to be.
Well indeed, and that's a great jumping-off point for something I wanted to talk to you about because obviously in the news over the last couple of weeks
Well, there's been a lot of things relating to Trump in the news
But one of the big things in the news that sort of came over here
because I'm sure things happen in America that don't hop across the pond
but one of the things that hopped across the pond in a big way was the declassification of
boxes and boxes of files related to the assassination of John F Kennedy and
For years, there's been a lot of conspiracy theories or just theories about the murder of JFK, the assassination of JFK.
Now, obviously, there is the official story, and many people have said...
Well, Lee Harvey Oswald, he went to Russia. He trained in Russia. He had a firearms license in Russia.
It was very hard to get a firearms license in Russia. It's not something that you would just get over there.
It's not like America where, you know, in the Soviet Union, not like America where every house had a gun.
In the Soviet Union, you only had a gun if you were very, very privileged or part of the establishment.
and then he was conveniently silenced before he went to trial and everything was nicely wrapped up
with a bow on top and then there's been all these conspiracies was it the mafia was it actually
the somehow the reds was it uh was it the soviets were they trying you know to cause World War
III or destabilize america uh there's been films about this and many many people have wrote many
Something that I wasn't really exposed to until I was exposed to your work was the theory that it was actually
This has become more and more prominent
It's sort of built on the back of really everything that you've done and I've heard more and more people talking about this now
Is it was actually Israel who played a role?
in the murder, the assassination of JFK. And this was largely down to JFK's sort of
obstinance when it came to assisting Israel with or turning a blind eye to Israel's development
of nuclear weapons. And as such, they wanted somebody in charge in America.
who would allow sort of the free flow of secrets to Israel and also ensure a blind eye was
turned to the development of nuclear arms, which obviously went against nuclear non-proliferation
agreements of the time.
So please tell us all about this, because I'm actually really fascinated with this,
you know read quite a number of things pointing in lots of different directions. I do watch a
few mafia videos on YouTube and you know the mafia people like to sort of try and claim they
had something to do with it because it's you know obviously generates hits but give us your theories
and what you know about this because it's a fascinating topic. Sure well what I should say is
until about 12 or 15 years ago I've never paid any attention to the JFK assassination. In other
It was committed by Lee Harvey Oswald, a deranged lone gunman with nobody else involved.
There was no conspiracy.
I just never really paid any attention to the issue.
And then, as I said, about 12 or 15 years ago, I started getting a little bit suspicious
about the issue for the first time and reading a couple of the books that had come out.
I mean, there have been hundreds or even thousands, I think, of JFK assassination books.
a couple of the key books, it became absolutely obvious that our president had been killed
by conspiracy and that what I'd always believed all those years was entirely false. It was,
in effect, a cover story. One reason I'd never been suspicious about the JFK assassination
was his attorney general, the highest law enforcement officer in the country.
And so I always said to myself, you know, even if I, you know, might have become slightly suspicious,
I said to myself, well, if there'd been the slightest trace of evidence of any conspiracy,
anybody had believed there was anything there, obviously Robert Kennedy, you know,
Taken very strong steps to track down the conspiracy to bring the people killed his own brother to justice and yet you know again everything i've seen was that robert kennedy firmly believe there been no conspiracy so you know if the president's own brother the highest law enforcement officer in the country.
didn't believe there was a conspiracy. It was very foolish for anybody to believe that,
and I never paid any attention to all the conspiracy theories floating around. I was
aware of them. Again, there were sometimes mentions in my newspapers of those books and
things like that, but I never paid any attention. But as it happened, one of the first books I
ended up reading about the JFK assassination was by David Talbot, a highly regarded mainstream
And he actually focused. He did about 150 interviews of people connected with the Kennedy
administration. And it turns out Robert Kennedy from almost the first moment believed that his
brother died in a conspiracy. In other words, everything I've been told about Robert Kennedy's
views was entirely wrong. Many other top people in the Kennedy administration also believed
The situation, though, was that Robert Kennedy, the moment he'd been the second most powerful person in the United States after his brother, who was the president.
But the moment John F. Kennedy was dead and his bitter enemy, Lyndon Johnson, the vice president, became president in his place, all of Robert Kennedy's authority and power disappeared.
Robert Kennedy was the superior of J. Edgar Hoover, the head of the FBI, but they had a very bad relationship.
In other words, Hoover really hated the Kennedys.
And so the moment suddenly the president had changed.
Hoover refused to take any directives from Robert F. Kennedy.
Robert Kennedy lost all of his power, and he told his friends and associates
there was nothing he could do to try to investigate his brother's death,
except if he then, in some time in the future, reached the White House himself.
He was a very young man. He was still in his 30s at the time.
Then, at that point,
He would be able to track down to break the case open and track down his brother's killer. So in other words, my entire reason for disbelieving in any conspiracy had been mistaken. It was simply the belief that Robert Kennedy didn't believe in the conspiracy and that was wrong.
So once I then read that book and found out that so many of the key people in the Kennedy administration.
believed more shots have been fired, believed that a conspiracy involved,
believed that Lee Harvey Oswald had not acted alone, I then started reading quite a number
of other books, you know, some of the mainstream JFK assassination books that I'd never paid any
attention to. And the evidence of a conspiracy was absolutely overwhelmed, absolutely overwhelming.
Now, again, once you simply come across the, you know,
amount of evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald had not acted alone, the question then becomes,
who was involved in the conspiracy? And why had they assassinated Kennedy? Now, you know,
again, there have been so many JFK conspiracy books written over the decades that, you know,
every separate possible agent has been, you know, fingered for having been involved,
just as you said, for example, many people felt the mafia was involved.
organized crime. Many people believe that elements of the CIA were involved.
People pointed to all sorts of different possible culprits
and groups that would have been involved. And the truth is there seems to be a
great deal of evidence that certain
individuals
the CIA and in organized crime were involved in the conspiracy, but generally
at a much lower level in most cases. In other words, you know, there's a
difference between the people on the ground who actually, for example, fired
the bullets or involved in implementing the assassination and then the much
higher-level people who orchestrated the attack. And so when it came down, if you're
One key factor, aside, there's a great deal of evidence that more gunmen fired and things
like that with regard to the JFK assassination, but I think it's important to connect the
death of John F. Kennedy.
With the assassination of his brother Robert Kennedy five years later because as I said
Robert Kennedy are told all of his friends and associates
That he planned to run for the presidency himself
And if he ended up reaching the White House and had the reins of power in his hands
He would then be able to break open the conspiracy and avenge the death of his brother
in 1968 Lyndon Johnson
became very unpopular because of the disastrous progress of the Vietnam War,
so Johnson decided not to run for election. He dropped out of the race. At that point,
Robert F. Kennedy entered the Democrat primaries as a last-minute contender. He ended up doing
extremely well, partly because of his name as Kennedy and people regarded him as sort of the
And he ended up then winning a number of crucial primaries and then finally winning the gigantic winner take all california primer putting him on an easy path to the nomination to the democratic nomination.
And most people felt he would probably be able to win the presidential election coming up in a few months at the moment he won the democratic primer in california.
As he was, you know, as the victory was being announced, he was suddenly assassinated himself.
And so we have two Kennedy assassinations taking place together.
And there's quite a lot of evidence that Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated exactly for the reason to prevent him from reaching the White House and avenging.
his martyred brother. Now, when we're talking about the John F. Kennedy assassination,
there's a tremendous amount of evidence that conspiracy was involved,
that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone, that more shots were fired.
But the evidence is large and complicated. In other words, you have to read articles,
you have to read books. It takes quite a lot of effort to come to that conclusion.
But in the case of the Robert Kennedy assassination,
It's very cut and dried. There's no two ways about it. There's overwhelming physical evidence.
For example, the coroner's report in California, the official coroner's report by Thomas de Gucci,
showed that Robert F. Kennedy was killed. The fatal shot was fired at point blank range behind him
at the back of his head from a distance of probably an inch or two inches.
everybody agrees was standing six or seven feet in front of him when he fired his bullets.
So in other words, there's simply no way he could have been responsible for the fatal injury to
Robert F. Kennedy. Furthermore, an audio tape shows that at least a dozen shots were fired
And for those reasons, for example, the LA Coroner declared at the time and in his published memoirs
that there obviously had been a second gunman involved.
In fact, eyewitnesses at the time reported that a temporary security guard at the hotel
was standing right behind Kennedy at the time he was shot with his gun drawn.
It turns out that individual was somebody who had a ferocious, deep personal hatred
of the Kennedy brothers.
I think it's very clear who was involved and who actually fired the fatal shot to kill
But all of that was covered up at the trial. In other words, none of this evidence came out
at the trial of Sirhan Sirhan, and it was only years or decades later that got enough attention
for people to realize what had happened. Now, it turns out, just a couple of years ago,
Ended up investigating this stuff all of his life
He'd believe that sir Han sir Han and killed his father
But he was persuaded by one of his father's friends to look at the evidence
To look at the coroner's report to look at the audio tape to those things and it was very clear
That sir Han sir Han was an innocent patsy. So he ended up actually publishing an op-ed
in the San Francisco Chronicle, declaring that Sirhan Sirhan had not been the gunman who killed his father
and should be released from prison.
If you read some of the books regarding the Robert F. Kennedy assassination,
it's very clear that Sirhan Sirhan was essentially a Patsy.
In other words, he indicated he never remembered.
having fired the fatal shots and people at the time described him as seeming to be in almost in a trans hypnotized
Under some sort of conditioning. So he was simply used as the distraction
drawing attention to himself as he fired a few wild bullets
while Kennedy was then shot point blank range from behind
by the actual gunman. So, you know, when we have a situation where
Robert F. Kennedy has vowed to reach the White House
and investigate the killing of his brother
and track them, track down the people and bring them to justice
and he's killed right at the moment.
that his path to the White House became very clear and obvious.
I think it shows the direct connection between those two assassinations.
So it makes it very likely that the Kennedy brothers
were both killed by the same group of individuals
or party involved. Now when we're looking at the Robert F. Kennedy assassination
The fact that the Patsy who was selected to draw attention and take the fall for what happened
Was a Palestinian immigrant named Sirhan Sirhan and it was portrayed as
Being the fact that he killed Kennedy because Kennedy was so pro-Israel
That's what all the media reports said at the time even though that wasn't really the case
That clearly tends to point in a certain direction, in other words, it would raise obvious suspicions that the Israeli government and pro-Isra groups were responsible for picking a Palestinian Patsy.
who allegedly hated Kennedy for his pro-Israel sentiments who would take the fall for the assassination.
Furthermore, I'm not sure if you've heard of it, but a man named Ronan Bergman, a prominent journalist,
several years ago wrote the definitive history of Mossad assassinations.
He ended up having full cooperation with the Mossad.
His book was endorsed by a number of former Mossad directors.
It runs about 700 pages long, and it's
a very authoritative count of the Israeli Mossad
and its history of assassinations.
Obviously, it doesn't include some of these more.
you know, extremely controversial cases of American political figures who've been attacked by Mossad.
But it covers an enormous number of Israeli assassinations.
And in fact, it pretty much clearly indicates that the Israeli Mossad has been responsible for more political assassinations around the world.
not only than any other intelligence services such as the CIA or the KGB,
but probably more responsible than all these other intelligence services combined.
We're talking about probably 2,000 or 3,000 political assassinations over the years.
And although they weren't covered in his book,
It's certainly established that Israeli Zionist and Mossad groups have been responsible for the attempted assassinations of American presidents and other top political leaders.
For example, very few people are aware of it.
But Truman, there was an attempt by Zionist forces to assassinate Harry Truman.
Using a letter bomb at the time at the point when he was hesitating to endorse the establishment of the state of Israel
It's covered for example in the memoirs of his own daughter Margaret Truman and some of the other people in his administration
But probably it was never covered by the American media at the time
Also, for example, a Mossad defector named Viktor Ostrovsky published a couple of bestsellers
about 30 years ago, and in them he revealed that the Mossad had attempted to assassinate
President George H.W. Bush at the time when Bush and the Israeli government wore loggerheads
over American loan guarantees.
for West Bank settlements. In other words, they were in a bitter dispute and the
Mossad, the Israeli government, decided to try to arrange
Bush's assassination, blaming it on Palestinian terrorist groups. It didn't
go ahead, partly because Viktor Ostrovsk and some of the other
Felt it was far too risky to step and a Stravski basically ended up warning the Bush administration of what was happening
They took the warnings very seriously and the plot was called off. But when we're talking about, you know
documented credible attempts to assassinate a couple of other American
political presidents and quite a lot of other political leaders around the
world. I mean, for example, they're solidly documented attempts that Zionist
groups tried to assassinate most of the top leaders of the British government.
during the period of the time Winston Churchill and the other top cabinet ministers at the time when Britain was refusing
to recognize the independence of the state of Israel that the Israeli designers groups did
assassinate Lord Moyn the British Minister for the Middle East they assassinated
Camp Bernadotte the UN peace negotiator
They've really assassinated more of the sort of very high-ranking political leaders around the world
that normally are considered entirely off-limits by any sort of intelligence service that might
consider assassinations. So in other words, if we're looking at organizations with a history
of political assassinations at a very high level, Zionist groups and the Israeli
for the Kennedy assassination and examining the nature of the assassination.
When we're looking at the Kennedy assassination, one key thing we have to consider is if a conspiracy was involved,
the one individual that we're absolutely sure was part of that conspiracy was Jack Ruby.
the man who assassinated Lee Harvey Oswald.
And when you look at Jack Ruby's background,
he basically was somebody involved in organized crime.
But he was involved in the Jewish wing of organized crime,
which receives much, much less attention than the Italian or Sicilian wing.
Furthermore, many of the organized crime figures that Ruby was closest to.
were individuals very heavily supportive of the State of Israel and very heavily involved in, for example, gun-running to the State of Israel during the Israeli War of Independence, 1948, 1949.
So we're talking about an individual who was very close.
to elements of the Israeli, of the pro-Israel organized crime community, groups like for
example, Meyer Lansky was one of the top figures in American organized crime, and a very, very
strong supporter of Israel. Furthermore, when Ruby was then arrested and incarcerated, he
ended up telling his rabbi, who visited him, that he shot Lee Harvey Oswald for the Jews.
Now, you know, there are a lot of different possible interpretations that can put on that
statement, but that statement was made. And it certainly raises a reasonable suspicion
that Ruby was recruited by pro-Israel groups to shut the mouth of Lee Harvey Oswald.
who was the Patsy that he claimed to be.
In other words, under virtually all of the conspiratorial
analysis, once you agree that a conspiracy was involved
behind the JFK assassination, almost everybody agrees
that Lee Harvey Oswald was simply the fall guy, the Patsy.
He never fired a bullet.
He had nothing to do with the event.
He was simply the person selected.
To be blamed for the assassination and in fact the other thing about it at the time
He was widely portrayed as a communist sympathizer
Castro sympathizer all of that was entirely false
There's absolutely overwhelming evidence that he was actually involved with the right-wing
Anticastro groups in other words with elements of for example the CIA or organized crime that we're trying to assassinate
Castro or bring him down
and he was simply using the cover of being a pro-communist sympathizer to, you know, discredit
Castro to, for example, pass out leaflets to do the sort of things that, you know,
intelligence services often do to try to discredit their enemies.
So the interesting thing about is, when Lee Harvey Oswald defected to Russia, he almost certainly defected as an agent of naval intelligence.
In other words, he basically was sent to Russia as part of an intelligence sting operation.
To pass certain secrets to the Russians that you know our intelligence service wanted to get them to find out certain things from them
And that to return to the United States the fact that he was able to freely return to the United States after having allegedly
Given some of our radar secrets to the Soviet Union
It is, you know, perfect proof that he was simply, you know, an agent of American intelligence.
And then, you know, he continued his activities.
In other words, his activities then, in conjunction with the efforts to overthrow Castro or possibly seem assassinated,
were simply part of his continuing intelligence activities.
Many people around it, many of the people he worked for and operated with,
and intelligence, lower level intelligence operatives, came together to try to get rid of
Castro and achieve other sorts of things. So then we agree that, you know, there's overwhelming
evidence there was a conspiracy to kill JFK. And the question is, who did it and why? Now,
there were a lot of different organizations that had motives for eliminating Kennedy.
For example, organized crime felt that Kennedy had double crossed them. In other words,
they ended up helping him steal enough votes in the 1960 election in Chicago and Texas
to end up defeating Richard Nixon when the presidency. And they assumed then he would,
in return, call off some of the federal investigations of them. But instead, his brother Robert Kennedy.
Became one of the greatest opponents of organized crime in the United States. So organized crime certainly felt betrayed by Kennedy
But there's no history of organized crime in the United States ever trying to assassinate a
Political figure remotely as important as the president of the United States
I mean that they might be involved for example with a city councilman with an assemblyman here and there
But there's no record of ever targeting
senator, a governor, anybody of that high level, let alone the President of the
United States. So while certain individuals in organized crime might have
cooperated in the plot, it's very, very unlikely that they would have been the
moving element behind it. Similarly, with regard to the CIA,
There's a great deal of evidence, including sworn testimony that later came out, that
members of the CIA were involved in the assassination conspiracy, but again, at a relatively low
level.
In other words, they clearly, you know, for their own reasons,
where they and, for example, some of the Antracastro Cubans that they worked with,
felt that Kennedy had betrayed them over the Bay of Pigs.
And so, there certainly were lower-level individuals involved in the assassination plot.
But there's no evidence that anybody at the top level...
was involved in organizing the conspiracy.
In fact, the interesting thing about it,
there's a man named John Newman,
who had spent 20 years in military intelligence
working for the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Afterwards, he retired and then became a professor
of history at the University of Maryland.
Over the decades, he's used his skills,
intelligence skills he developed over the 20 years
of working for the government.
to gradually connect and analyze all the declassified files of the CIA that have been released over the decades.
And he came to the conclusion that there'd certainly been suspicions attached to individual high-ranking CIA officials that might have been involved in the plot.
With Alan Dulles, the former head of the CIA who was fired by Kennedy,
to have helped to organize the pot to get rid of Kennedy.
But what Newman did by looking at those careful records
was to find that they pointed an entirely different direction.
First of all, these intelligence files
that had been in the class about over the decades
provided no indication whatsoever
that the CIA as an organization
had been involved in the Kennedy conspiracy.
In other words, individual CIA officers or members
were probably involved, but not the organization as a whole, and certainly not its director.
But what he did find is that one particular high-ranking CIA officer,
James Angleton, who had been the long-time head of counterintelligence,
was clearly the CIA individual who was involved in the conspiracy.
In other words, he helped orchestrate the CIA documents that seemed to point to Lee Harvey Oswald.
as having been involved and linked to Kremlin assassination plots.
And that was the cover story in effect that the CIA underangled and helped produce.
The suspicion that Lee Harvey Oswald had killed the president of the United States
under the orders of the KGB or the Russian government.
And, you know, that was such a horrifying result because it would potentially mean war with Russia.
that so many individuals were willing to cover up the assassination and say it was a lone gunman,
basically a crazy lone gunman, rather than any sort of conspiracy plot.
And that was the tremendous insight.
that Newman produced by spending years analyzing the classified CIA documents.
So one thing I should say, which is a crucial point, and it's now been confirmed by these documents that came out that were released in the last couple of weeks,
closest to the Israeli Mossad in the Israeli government. In fact, he was so
close to the Israeli Mossad that at some point suspicions came out that he'd
really become a Mossad asset. And after his death, the Israeli government gave
him unprecedented honors because of all the help that he'd given them over the
years. And in fact, some of the documents that were just released, in fact, some of
had actually helped provide the Israeli governments with nuclear weapons information,
assisting their program to develop nuclear weapons, exactly the program that John F. Kennedy had sworn to oppose.
Now, the things Angleton's support for the Israeli nuclear weapons program was well known among people who've dug into it.
investigative journalists that published a book 30 years ago revealing that Angleton
and assisted the Israeli nuclear weapons program. Many newspapers had reported, but what these
documents revealed was the absolute proof of that fact. In other words, in black and
white government documents, furthermore, it was interesting that many of these documents
the Israeli Massad's relationship with Angleton.
So in other words, it's highly suspicious
that the redacted portions of those documents
that had previously been released
all discussed Angleton's relationship
with the Israeli Massad.
So again, that doesn't prove
that the Israeli Massad was responsible,
but points very strongly in that direction.
Now the interesting thing about the Israeli Massad's
possible involvement in the JFK assassination, is that for the first 30 years after the assassination
of John F. Kennedy, every other possible organization or individual.
was pointed to in the books and articles written by the conspiracy researchers
except for the state of Israel.
Nobody had ever raised the slightest suspicion for 30 years that Israel had been involved in the assassination
because it seemed to make absolutely no sense.
Nobody believed that there was any motive for an Israeli involvement.
John F. Kennedy had won the support of 80% of Jewish voters in the United States when he was elected president.
He was regarded, he was viewed in tremendously favorable light by most American Jews.
Top American Jews in Hollywood, in Wall Street, in the Ivy League, ended up working in his
administration or supporting him very strongly. So he was a tremendous hero for American Jews.
And, you know, there was no, he was perceived as being very pro-Israel.
A couple of the earliest conspiracy researchers who helped break the fact that there was a conspiracy
were Mark Lane and Edward Epstein, both of whom came from a Jewish background.
And Jewish act and Jewish prominent Jewish figures such as Norman Mailer and Mort Saul
ended up promoting the notion of a conspiracy to kill John F. Kennedy.
So, in other words, there were so many Jewish individuals, American Jews, involved in all
aspects of the JFK administration, supporting him politically, donating money to him.
And then after he was assassinated, arguing that he was killed by conspiracy, that the
for the Israelis to have killed him was one reason that nobody ever suggested
that Israel had any involvement. But then, in the early 1990s, books started suddenly coming out
describing the Israeli nuclear weapons program, nuclear weapons development program, and pointing
out that Kennedy had made a huge secret effort to block that program. He'd put enormous pressure
to halt all of its nuclear weapon development program,
threatening Israel with a cut off of all military aid and all support
unless they abandoned nuclear weapons development.
In fact, his pressure was so severe that Israel's founding premier, David Ben-Gurion,
was driven from office. He was forced to resign,
to avoid being subject to that pressure from the Kennedy administration.
And so suddenly a motive appeared, a gigantic motive, that possibly explained why Kennedy
had been killed and why at least the Israelis could have been involved.
And one journalist, Michael Collins Piper, after noticing those books and suddenly putting
two and two together, he'd never previously been involved in Kennedy assassination research,
All of these previous books had clues that he could easily find that put together showed
tremendous amount of evidence that
Pro-Israel groups that individuals closely connected with the Israeli Mossad and that possible
Mossad agents themselves
Were involved in the Israeli set in the assassination of John of Kennedy so almost exactly 30 years ago in late
1994 he published his book called final judgment
Setting forth for the first time the case that the Israeli Mossad had been a set played a central role in the assassination of John of Kennedy and
That book such an explosive thesis it became an bestseller, but an underground bestseller
The idea was so dramatic and so dangerous that absolutely nobody ever discussed it.
And that really is a very interesting clue to the whole puzzle. For example, as I started reading
JFK assassination books, I noticed that none of them ever mentioned Michael Colin Piper book.
For example, you know, these books might have bibliographies of 200 different assassination
But none of them ever included Piper's book.
None of them ever mentioned Piper.
None of them even mentioned Piper to denounce his theory is wrong.
In other words, his theory was so explosive and so dangerous,
especially in the context of the heavily Jewish American publishing industry,
that nobody would go near it.
And despite that, it still became an underground bestseller with 40,000 copies sold.
And once I read it, along with all these other session books,
being somebody from the outside who'd never paid attention to these JFK conspiracies
who'd never believed that they were true, the evidence he provided was so overwhelming.
it was clear that he had the strongest case involved.
In other words, the thing about the Israeli Mossad and Israel's involvement
is Kennedy was up for re-election in another year.
He would have a hard time getting re-elected because
he'd won election the first time because of his support from the solid
Democratic South.
But he then came out in favor of black civil rights.
So, the Southerners had turned very strongly against him.
He certainly might have been reelected, but it would have been a very difficult battle.
And so, most of these groups, for example, Mafia, Organized Crime, his enemies in the
CIA, other groups, Texas Billionaires who didn't like him, they could have easily then
I mean he would have had a very hard time. I mean he'd been involved in all sorts of sexual
escapades. I mean there were very, very many women in his background and that could have been used
to damage his position and help get him defeated. The only one of the very few outside groups that
For killing Kennedy then, rather than trying to defeat him in a year's time, was the Israeli government because they were under massive Kennedy pressure to halt and eliminate their nuclear weapons program.
Besides that, the other clue that came out was that when Kennedy was running for election the first time.
A group of extremely wealthy Jewish millionaires, pro-Israel millionaires, had met with him
privately and offered to entirely fund his presidential campaign if he would give control
of Middle Eastern policy to the pro-Israel lobby in the United States.
Kennedy sort of fobbed them off saying that he certainly supported Israel in many ways.
Over that political offer that the next morning he met with one of his closest friends in DC a prominent journalist and
Told him that if he ended up reaching the White House
He would certainly crack down on the Israel lobby and destroy its power so that something like that can never happen in the future
And he and his brother Robert the Attorney General were doing exactly that
They were taking legal steps to declare the Israel lobby a foreign agent
which would have destroyed their power, in effect to break the power of the Israeli lobby.
They were at the point of doing so when Kennedy was then assassinated, and his brother lost all
of his power, and immediately upon Kennedy's assassination, the policy towards the Israeli
lobby was completely reversed under Lyndon Johnson, and it was allowed to become APAC,
controls nearly all the members of Congress.
So the Israeli Nuclear Weapons Program and Kennedy's determination to break the domestic power of the Israel Abbey.
were clearly very strong reasons for his assassination.
One reason that individuals who've been very skeptical
of an Israeli conspiracy against Kennedy
have argued that there were no group involved
is when they looked at, for example, the policies
of the Kennedy administration
and compared them with the policies of a successor, Lyndon Johnson.
There was absolute continuity. In other words, Kennedy had started the Vietnam War, Johnson continued.
Kennedy had proposed massive social welfare programs in Congress.
Johnson enacted them. Kennedy had proposed civil rights for blacks in the United States.
Johnson carried it out. Most of the top officials in the Kennedy administration
then became, they stayed on and became top officials in the Johnson administration.
So people reasonably asked, why would any group have assassinated Kennedy
if all they got was exactly the same policies under successor Lyndon Johnson?
The one and only exception was our policies towards the state of Israel and the domestic
Israel lobby, which immediately underwent a total reversal. So if you're looking for means,
motive, and opportunity, all the evidence points very strongly towards Israel and its Mossad.
as having played a completely central role
in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
There's another figure involved as well.
You know, I've already mentioned Angleton.
You know, somebody very close to Israeli Mossad
who helped on the inside of the CIA
setting up the false trail for Oswald as the Patsy.
But there's one more individual involved.
As I started reading these JFK assassination books,
one very strange thing I noticed
was that almost none of them ever suggested that Lyndon Johnson had been involved. Now when the
President of the United States is assassinated and his Vice President suddenly reaches the Oval
Office in his place, I mean it seemed to me the most obvious person in the world to suspect would
are, you know, married. And suddenly the husband is killed, or the wife is killed.
You know, the first thing the police do is say, well, if there's no other suspect,
let's, you know, interrogate the other one. And it turns out what I discovered
reading these books, that Lyndon Johnson was
a bitter personal enemy of the Kennedys. They hated each other.
Johnson and Kennedy had fought a very bitter battle.
for the nomination in 1960 and Kennedy defeated Johnson. Johnson had spent most of the 1950
as the most powerful influential Democrat in America. Kennedy was just a minor senator.
Johnson viewed him with contempt and he certainly never viewed Kennedy as having any chance to win
It's been 25 years planning his son's path to the White House.
He was one of the wealthiest individuals in the United States and just as ruthless and effective politically as Johnson was.
So he ended up spending a huge amount of money, an unprecedented amount of money, on bribery and corruption and payoffs
to get his son, John of Kennedy, the nomination. And so Kennedy ended up defeating Johnson.
Johnson then
Kennedy then planned to put one of his friends on the ticket as the vice president,
but Johnson then deployed his political assets and probably a considerable amount of blackmail
to force himself on the Kennedy ticket as the vice president.
So we have a situation where Kennedy and Johnson bitterly hated each other.
And in fact, Kennedy then refused to give Johnson any political authority,
though he was the vice president, and it turns out,
Johnson, Kennedy then planned to get rid of Johnson
when running for a reelection.
In other words, what he was going to do
was to kick Johnson off the ticket
and then also destroy Johnson
because Johnson himself was a very corrupt individual.
A lot of people don't realize
Johnson basically was somebody who was born dirt poor.
His entire career was spent holding low paid government jobs and he entered the White House as one of the richest men in American history
with a personal fortune of, in present day terms, a hundred million dollars.
That's because he'd laundered all the massive bribes and corruption he took for the political favors he gave through his wife's business.
So he was an enormously wealthy corrupt individual who basically ran Texas. He controlled Texas.
And there was actually quite a lot of evidence that he was involved in a number of murders
in Texas to protect his corruption schemes. Kennedy knew that. He was aware of that. And so
To destroy Johnson to basically get the media to write. Um, but he was getting life magazine to write a massive expose
of Johnson's history of gigantic corruption back in Texas.
At that point, he would then use that exposé
to drop Johnson from the ticket
and probably have Johnson sent to prison.
It's shocking, but that gigantic exposé
of Johnson's corruption that was intended to destroy him
and had been orchestrated by the Kennedys
was ready to run in the next issue or two of Life Magazine.
Instead, Kennedy was assassinated before that issue could run.
And the same space that had been intended on this massive expose of Johnson's corruption
was instead devoted to the Kennedy assassination.
So in effect, what happened was Kennedy had been planning to destroy Johnson, drive him
for a second, send him to prison, and Johnson struck first.
for not waiting a year for Kennedy's reassass, assassination, Kennedy's re-election, but striking
when he could. And Johnson had all the levers of control once he became president, so he
orchestrated the cover-up. He orchestrated, for example, the false autopsy that hid the
fact that Kennedy had been struck by several different bullets. He then orchestrated the
He was the president. He had total power over all these things, and he could block Robert Kennedy
from carrying out any investigation himself.
It turns out there's actually fairly hard evidence that Johnson was involved in the conspiracy.
First of all, Johnson had been the political figure in the United States who was closest to the Israeli government.
During the 1950s, Johnson had been the man fighting the Eisenhower administration.
over its more even-handed Middle Eastern policy,
he was certainly viewed as the strongest pro-Zionist,
pro-Israel figure in America.
So somebody who certainly could have cooperated with
the Israelis on their mutual need
to eliminate President Kennedy.
Also, it turns out Johnson had a man named Mac Wallace,
was widely viewed as Johnson's sort of personal hitman.
who was strongly suspected of having been involved
in a number of the killings back in Texas
that Johnson orchestrated.
Johnson had tremendous power over the city of Dallas
where Kennedy was assassinated.
He controlled the city.
And so, you know, he certainly would find it very easy
to help organize the details of the conspiracy.
It turns out the sniper's nest that allegedly was used
by Lee Harvey Oswald to fire the fatal shot, but wasn't.
When the police investigated, when the FBI investigated, they found a mysterious fingerprint on one of the boxes that they couldn't identify.
Most of the other fingerprints were identified, but not that one. Years later, it was identified as the fingerprint of Mack Wallace, Johnson's personal hitman.
Now, it probably wasn't the case that Johnson's, that Mack Wallace fired any of the fatal shots, but he probably was sent to that location.
to set up the bullets or set up the scene to basically set up the incriminating evidence
in the implicating Lee Harvey Oswald.
Another interesting detail is that Johnson was in the car just behind Kennedy.
when they moved into the place where the fatal shots were fired.
Now, Johnson had been part of the conspiracy.
But, you know, when you're the vice president of the United States,
and you know that a sniper is about to assassinate the president of the United States,
you're obviously quite a bit nervous,
because what if they've decided to shut your mouth by killing you as well?
So, Johnson, being quite nervous,
ended up making all sorts of excuses to duck down in the car
as the car approached the fatal scene.
and once the first bullet was fired,
he reacted more quickly than anybody else.
He immediately dropped to the floor of his car.
The photographs show all the other individuals.
Remain seated, you know, they'd heard of something that sounded like it might be a gunshot. They weren't sure what was going on
They were still visible
Johnson had disappeared because he dropped to the bottom of his car and eyewitnesses reported the same thing
So in other words, we have a situation where the most pro-Israel political figure in the United States
Lyndon Johnson who was about to be destroyed by the Kennedy administration and sent to prison
obviously means motive and opportunity to take place in the plot. We have the
Israeli government desperate to block Kennedy's efforts to eliminate their
nuclear weapons program and is also his other efforts to destroy the Israel
lobby in the United States, also having means motive and opportunity and having
the longest track record.
involvement in high-level political assassinations of any organization in the
world, probably more than CIA, the KGB, and the next 10 intelligence organizations
combined. And then we also have James Angleton, the high-ranking CIA official
who was the closest to the Israeli Mossad, so close that many suspected him of
actually being a Mossad asset.
Whom the documents proved was the conspirator inside the CIA, who set up the false trail
implicating Lee Harvey Oswald.
So in other words, all of that combined.
There certainly were lower level people from organized crime, especially the Jewish wing
of organized crime.
There were some lower level CIA officers involved in the plot.
seems extremely strong and
None of these documents released in the last few weeks really so far at least
Seem to really show any new evidence in other words. They simply confirm
The statements and the reports that people have known for 20 or 30 years, but they do confirm them in black and white print
The fact that they were previously
Released in redacted form in some cases with the name of the Israeli Mossad the Israeli intelligence agency removed
shows probably that some people at a very high level of the U.S. government, or the CIA itself,
certainly suspected that the Israeli Mossad might have some incriminating evidence in these documents.
And it could be that after individuals like John Newman or other experts spend months or years
analyzing all the individual documents, the 60,000 pages of documents that have been released,
that they will be able to combine them together, connect all the dots to find out some new discoveries like Newman had done regarding Angleton 30 years ago.
But I think the case, the overall case for Lyndon Johnson, the Israeli Mossad, and Angleton's involvement is absolutely extremely strong, and the fact that nobody is willing to discuss it.
Nobody was willing for 30 years to discuss Piper's book, and even today, almost none of the JFK conspiracy researchers or organizations will ever discuss this idea, shows how tremendously explosive it is.
shows that, you know, they're probably aware of just how dangerous the ground
would be if they ended up discussing these subjects. So, I mean, that's basically,
you know, what I've put together in reading these books. I've done no new
research of my own. I simply read a dozen or 15 of these books after having never
paid any attention to the JFK assassination nearly my entire life. And
the evidence pointing
Towards Lyndon Johnson, the Israeli Mossad, and James Angleton as being the key high-level conspirator simply seems overwhelming.
Well, that's fantastic. Sorry, I've just drunk a juice and it's gone down the wrong way.
That's incredible and basically
When you look at it all in the way that you've put it and you were speaking for sort of almost an hour there
Well, maybe 45 minutes could be the little intro
But that as a self-contained lecture on the on the issue is so compelling and throughout
So usually when people are talking for a long time
I sort of interrupt because I see little sort of things that they've either missed or things that I think haven't been explained correctly
When it only happened to me twice, have guests completely explain things and the list of things I have to ask you.
On the back of that is basically zero because you explained everything and all the little things that I thought might be caveats or follow-up questions that I had you actually answered in your narrative which is in which makes it even more
compelling sort of you tied everything up so well so obviously if the audience has any questions for you on that we will ask them because we're in the second half of the show.
much appreciated we haven't got as many donations and questions tonight as we
usually get which is a bit of a shame so please do consider making a donation if
you can obviously you know this is how I keep my head above water so if you guys
would like me to keep doing shows like this please do consider donating but I
do have one question for Rob before we move forward and
It's incredible what he's done here as well sort of it's almost like he's followed every little scrap of evidence
So the people have presented and sort of put it all together in a way that I was completely spellbound
And usually when people are talking like this, I do a lot of googling
So my eyes are all over the place because all the things he was mentioning
I was sort of googling and checking and everything he said here
He's so well researched. I couldn't found anything
When he was talking that I found to be a flaw in that and his explanation of sort of why Lee Harvey Oswald was in Russia, etc
Makes perfect sense, especially
You know, I dropped that in the beginning and that was the one sort of big smoking gun that people have when they claim
It was a Soviet plot was why was he in Russia?
Ron's explained that very very
Succinctly so my question now for you
And really, I'm sort of sorry that I couldn't book you in for sort of four hours because I could listen to a lot more of this, but we've only got two hours.
But just quickly, before we do go for the questions for what we've got from the audience, and I can always shoot some over if there aren't any more coming in.
But the question I've got for you now is.
When Trump came to power, I said on a couple of shows, one of two things is about to happen.
You're either going to get Trump coming in and he will be more amenable to stopping what's going on in the Ukraine,
but more likely to escalate what's going on in the Middle East.
a power base that would call for restraint in the Middle East and not necessarily want
to get as involved in the Middle East, but it would be less restrained in Eastern Europe
and more anti-Russian than Trump will be.
So we've sort of tossed that coin, overwhelmingly it came up Trump, I mean he won everything
sort of squabbling amongst themselves, trying to figure out where they want to go next to combat
this. But it's also left Trump with the power to...
essentially take America into a war with a sizable backing and before he came to
power and I have to credit the people who said this and it was Warren Balog who
really pushed this point home that if Trump did come to power he would be the
one man that could re-energize young white American men to go sign up and
fight for America in the war in a war in the Middle East and obviously over the
this rapid escalation of sort of calls for an invasion of Iran, Trump talking about
invading Iran and the sort of right-wing press around the world talking about Iran's ability
to strike U.S. and U.K. bases in places like the Chagos Islands, saying that Iran's now
this big threat. They're considering attacking bases and we should have a preemptive strike.
And you can always tell when there's going to be something like this kicking off because the
good at locking down their comments section so there's no racism there's no
sort of bigotry there's no calls for violence all of those blocks come off
when they want a war to come about so you can't talk badly about
muslim men who rape young white girls in britain because you'll get banned in the comment section
but if you talk about how great it would be to string up russian soldiers by their feet and
torture them to death your comments fine and i've noticed in the last couple of days comments about
how Iran should be sort of bombed until it's glass or you know every last building in Iran
should be levelled you know men women and children should be slaughtered en masse and it was about
time we did this they're all being let through and voted up almost as if they were being botted
as if they were bought comments um what do you think the likelihood is of Trump going into Iran
take this beyond just a bombing campaign because obviously it's one thing destabilizing a nation
with missiles and bombs. It's another thing taking it to boots on the ground which would
inevitably lead, however you looked at it, to the loss of American lives.
Well, I mean, I certainly Trump has been making a lot of noises the last few days about going to war with Iran
You know, it's unclear to me whether that's more of a bluff or whether he's actually planning to do that because I mean it would most
I'm not a military expert, but most of the military experts whose opinion I take very highly or geopolitical experts
Agree, it would be a gigantic disaster
for the world and for the United States if we did start a war with Iran. Obviously it makes no
sense geopolitically since Iran has certainly been willing to negotiate. In other words,
we'd already signed a nuclear agreement with Iran under the Obama administration. Obviously,
Israel is driving America's policy, driving the Trump administration, and has been making
to get America to 20 or 30 years to get America to attack Iran.
So, you know, with Israel now riding so high within the Trump administration,
they feel this is the opportunity to strike and do something like that.
And they're certainly doing everything they can to sort of manipulate Trump into taking that action
and manipulate the elite, some of the top figures, some of the top Trump advisors to do that.
But I mean, at least the military experts, I know, believe it would be such a gigantic disaster for the United States and for the world.
I mean, basically, Iran would fire its missiles to destroy our bases.
I mean, they have hypersonic missiles they could probably sink an aircraft carrier to.
I mean, we're talking about possibly tens of thousands of Americans being killed.
by Iranian missiles if we attack them. Furthermore, I think the likelihood of our being able to
put boots on the ground in Iran is very, very low. In other words, we'd be talking about
having to put together hundreds of thousands of invasion troops. Iran is a country so much
And we had a disaster in trying to occupy Iraq.
I think there's almost no chance something like that
would be successful.
And also, remember at this point in time,
the Russians are in very, have very bad relations
with the United States because basically
we've been fighting a proxy war in Ukraine
on Russia's own border.
We've been killing Russian with our intelligence
information, with the missiles we provide.
So the Russians would certainly support the Iranians.
The Chinese would it well.
And I mean, it would be a total disaster.
And, I mean, oil prices would probably go to hundreds of dollars a barrel.
I mean, gasoline in the United States would go to $10 a gallon or something like that.
It would cause a worldwide economic.
disaster. I mean, for example, the Iranians probably would fire their missiles to destroy the oil facilities of
Saudi Arabia and the other Gulf states because if their facilities were being destroyed, why should they allow those of American allies to
survive? So, I mean, it resulted in a gigantic total disaster.
I mean, Trump is such an ignorant individual, and so gullible and so easily manipulated.
Just because something is a total disaster doesn't necessarily mean that Trump won't do it.
Now, most of the analysts I've been following think that the evidence of it being such a gigantic
disaster for the United States, really bringing down the Trump administration, bringing down the
I mean, putting the entire globe in a global, you know, depression is so bad that Trump
is simply bluffing.
In other words, Trump is somebody who bluffs a lot.
So in other words, talking about Iran, about bombing Iran may simply be a move he's making
to negotiate the best possible deal he will be with Iran.
For example, he did the same thing with North Korea.
He made all sorts of threats to bomb North Korea in his first administration and then
try to work out a deal with North Korea. So I'm certainly hoping we don't go to war with Iran.
But I mean, if we do, I think it would very likely be the end of American power. You know,
if you call America an empire, you'd mark the fall of the American empire. And I mean,
a disaster of unmitigated proportions, probably the worst thing that had ever happened in America
Well, I think the thing with Trump is I've always described Trump as kind of like the wild card
You never know what you're gonna get. It's kind of like
He's that sort of friend where you go on a night out with him and it can either be the best night out or the worst night out
And at any time during the night it can flip from one to the other and potentially back again
He just throws out those curveballs and sometimes he leaves you laughing sometimes he leaves you cheering
But he also can leave you sort of you know beating your fist against a wall in pure rage at his stupidity
and
you know, mad sort of about terms. I mean, as we've been talking, so the news has been breaking,
that he's been telling his insiders that he's getting rid of Elon Musk, which...
My God, that's a big step.
I mean, well, apparently this has caused...
This has caused...
Sort of the Tesla stock to go up. So googling it now
Musk
Elon Musk, he's actually done it Elon Musk dramatically steps down from his doge in shock move after Trump
expressed private doubts
so
President Trump has reportedly informed his cabinet and in a circle Elon Musk will be stepping back
from his high profile government role in the coming weeks and he'll be returning to the business
world so apparently that is it. Musk is done and he is leaving so the Daily Mail have said that he
is definitely stepping down and this has caused the Tesla stock to rise somewhat but that is one
It is sort of, it is kind of like one of those things with Trump, where he does tend to sort of run a very unstable ship and people who are sort of first mate one day can be getting keelhauled the next day.
It's kind of, it's very strange how that happens.
I kind of see it as like in most, in most sort of establishments, you work your way up.
And, you know, this takes time.
And then you can get demoted, and obviously you can get sacked and go right down the ladder.
But with Trump, it's kind of a little bit more wild, that's kind of like Nero's court,
where one minute you can be the guy sort of, you know, serving the glasses of water to people in the meeting.
the next day Trump's taking a liking to you and you can basically be defense secretary
and two days later you're sacked, humiliated and you'll never work in politics again and it's kind
of like the three-day rise and fall of the water boy. I don't know what you think about this and
whether you think Musk going will be a big gain or a big loss to Trump. Well it's hard to say, I
mean you know again there've been a lot of controversies regarding Musk's doge project and
could be causing like a disaster with checks, social security checks not going out or things
like that. But I mean, Musk is certainly, you know, one of those powerful people in
the administration, even though he didn't have an official title. So I certainly didn't
expect this sort of thing to happen. In fact, given that leaked conversation regarding the
bombing of Yemen, you know, that was leaked to that Atlantic reporter, I mean, there were
a lot, there was a lot of speculation that the guy who set up the conversation on that
and was responsible for bringing in Goldberg, you know, the Atlantic reporter,
Michael Waltz, you know, Trump's national security divisor would be fired.
So, you know, if the word had come out that Waltz had been fired, I wouldn't really be that surprised.
But I didn't see Musk's removal, you know, on the horizon.
No, it is very odd. Anyway, we'll go to questions from the audience, and if you haven't super-chatted yet and you want to, please consider doing so.
Open Borders for Israel gave $5. Thank you so much. I love Ron Onnes' site and his excellent articles.
Is the ADL still quiet about Ron, or are they coming after him now?
Oh, very much so. In other words, that's actually an interesting story. Until about six or seven years ago, when I started writing some of my more controversial articles, I was sort of reasonably well known for, you know, sometimes writing things that were sort of a little bit edgy or a little bit controversial, but nothing like, you know, any of this stuff.
World War II all these ultra ultra controversial issues and a lot of people at the time start saying my god
Why isn't the ADL attacking you? You know again? I mean the ADL attacks people who do even a tiny sliver
the sort of writing that I'd done and I sort of said well I I think probably
they're just nervous about bringing attention to me and that's the reason
they're not attacking to me. So I ended up actually publishing a couple of pieces
laughing at the ADL for being too scared to take me on or something like that.
And they finally published a very mealy mouth, anonymous post, just sort of
mildly criticizing me a little bit. I mean something very very minor.
And that gave me the opening to then reveal the true history of the ADL,
which I knew quite well about and which most people did not. And, you know, for example,
the ADL was founded just over a hundred years ago with the primary mission.
of preventing the just punishment of a Jewish rapist and murder.
In other words, a guy named, let's see what his name, Leo Frank,
had basically raped and murdered a young girl, a 13-year-old girl.
He was obviously guilty. He was sentenced to death.
The ADL was organized and raised a gigantic amount of money to prevent him from being polished.
Its entire history presented as like the great hero the founding hero of the ideal the martyred
Jewish victim, but anybody really looks into the case in any detail
You know contrary to just taking what you know our textbooks say
There's absolutely overwhelming evidence that Leo Frank was entirely guilty not only that but Leo Frank was in the south
to try to avoid being punishment for his crime he tried to orchestrate the lynchings of several
innocent black men. So we're talking about basically a Jewish child molester and killer
who raped and murdered a 13 year old girl and then to basically save his known neck tried to
I mean, you can't imagine anything that would sound worse in American history,
but it's all been covered up by the American media and American textbooks for 100 years.
Also, for example, the ADL was probably heavily involved in bugging Martin Luther King's
hotel room. In other words, people have always condemned the FBI.
For having bugged Martin Luther King and really and had those secret tapes of Martin Luther King's
Activities with prostitutes and women. It was actually the ADL with just the ADL for example
had files 20 years ago 25 years ago they already had files on over a million
Americans it had really become the equivalent of an American Stasi
organization so anyway the ADL published a short anonymous rather milk toast
piece criticizing me in mild terms I then responded with a long article
providing the document a true history of the ADL
and the ADL since then has kept a very wide berth of my website and it's
basically avoided even mentioning my name not only that but the apparently
issued some sort of it seems very likely that issued some sort of edict or
demand that no mainstream media organization ever be willing to mention
the existence of our website or mention my name in particular
for risk of the fact of gaining attention. So for example, in some cases, there have been major
scandals dominating the American media, you know, that I've actually read about in the New York
Times. And I said, oh, interesting scandal, what really is going on there? And I've discovered
those scandals involve an article written and published on our own website. But the media
coverage was so carefully written that I didn't even realize they were talking about our own website.
So, you know, again, the ADL certainly, I would be very nice if the ADL were willing to take me on in any sort of way to attack me in the strongest way they could, but unfortunately, I've had no success in luring them into taking that sort of action.
Thank you. My Los M gave $1.40. Thank you so much to the endless bout of Mark for bringing Ron
uns to the stream. Sadly, I'll have to miss it, but kudos nonetheless. At least one of my PWR
wishes has come true. I now hope for Russell Brand. Well, that one is not happening. I don't think.
Maybe better next time, said $3. Thank you so much. And he said, thank you for your work. Well,
thank you very much. Jez999 gave $5. Thank you so much. And he said, Ron,
Do you buy the official story on the Trump shooting
that a gunman grazed his ear and the secret service
were too incompetent to prevent it?
Well, I can't be entirely sure,
but yes, I generally believe that story occurred
for one simple reason.
And again, that was my first reaction at the time.
If there had actually been a number of different conspiracy theories out there, but I mean, one of them obviously is that there was a deliberate attack and organized conspiratorial attack to kill Donald Trump, and he certainly had enough enemies or enough groups that wanted to kill him.
The main reason I don't think that's the case is Donald Trump wasn't killed. In other words, if you were going after Donald Trump, you would have brought in a very professional hitman.
several, several professional snipers. So for example, the guy who was shot and
killed would have been a perfectly useful distractor. In other words, a Patsy.
Somebody put out there to attract people's attention while your
professional sniper kills Trump.
But, I mean, that's what they would have done.
I mean, that guy who actually they ended up shooting and killing was just some sort of
random guy he didn't even, he wasn't particularly a good shot.
And if you're organizing a conspiracy to kill Donald Trump, you're being in a very top quality
sniper.
Another conspiracy theory out there is basically that it was orchestrated by Trump's supporters
to get sympathy for him.
And I'm very skeptical of that.
In other words, if you're Donald Trump
and somebody comes to you and says,
we have a great idea to help you get elected,
we're gonna bring in a sniper.
He's gonna shoot at your head,
miss your ear by a fraction of an inch.
And so don't worry, you know,
don't worry if there's a sniper shooting at your head.
Everything's gonna be fine.
He's one of our people.
I just find it very doubtful
that even somebody as gullible as Donald Trump.
Would have supported something like that. So as far as I can say, I'm not saying the official story
Sounds all that plausible, but I'm saying that stories the conspiratorial cases either by a pro-trump side or an anti-trump side
Conspiracy seem even less plausible given what had happened to put it another way if Donald Trump had been shot and killed I
Would have been almost sure it was done as part of a conspiracy
You know, just the way in the JFK assassination, the Robert Kennedy assassination, you bring
in some, you know, distractor, some patsy to fire a few bullets in the right direction.
And then you have a top quality sniper firing for much longer range that kills the candidate.
So the fact that Donald Trump survived.
I think is the main reason I think it probably was, you know, just that random guy who shot at him now
One interesting thing about that case is I've often what I was really surprised at was not that somebody tried to shoot Donald Trump
But that it hadn't already happened 20 or 30 previous times
I mean remember the mainstream media in the United States had spent years had spent eight years
portraying Donald Trump as the most evil, dangerous man in the United States.
Somebody who is a horrible enemy of American freedom,
who is the greatest enemy of American society that had come about in decades.
So you would think that would be exactly the sort of thing.
That would encourage a few individual people with a few screws loose to go and try to shoot Donald Trump
In other words, you know, you would I've been expecting somebody to take shots of Donald Trump for years when he was president
And then he was when he then tried to run for reelection
And I was just very surprised, nothing had happened until right at the end.
So, you know, it's possible, for example, that the secret service then was ordered to relax their guard to some extent.
And they could easier, for example, for somebody to get to Donald Trump.
But I mean, that's the most I probably would, you know, believe that any sort of conspiracy was involved.
Yeah, I'm sort of inclined to sort of you know agree with what you're saying here. I mean at the end of the day
if Trump had been shot dead, and then there was some dysfunctional sort of drug-addled,
you know, prescription drugs, young lad who had been on the internet and had conveniently
just written a manifesto, you know, he could barely shoot a rifle, but somebody over his
shoulder had been, you know, taking Trump's eye out from a thousand metres, that's kind
of more what you're expecting.
people put forward a number of serious arguments saying look he was in a very obvious space he
was on the roof etc etc you know the secret service didn't seem to do about anything about it lots of
people shouted gunmen and it took them ages to actually do anything um i think some of that is
literally incompetence you know you i know here in the uk um when i was a young lad all police
men who were you know they had to be over six foot tall
they were impressively built they were the sort of people who'd be rugby
players or sportsmen that go into the you know the forces
and they were a force to be reckoned with now
you see these little women who are barely five foot they're as wide as they are
tall and you think to yourself well
Are they really going to stop a group of young lads who are shoplifting or stop people fighting in the street?
The answer is no, of course they're not, but they're there because the state demands that certain number of these, you know, positions are filled by women who look like that.
And I think a lot of the sort of decline in the effectiveness of security services, the police, et cetera, is down to these diversity targets, really.
When you're when you're arranging something like that, I'm sure
You know you're doing security on a level like that. I'm sure as well getting all the different groups sort of
you know state police and federal agencies to coordinate it's probably a nightmare as well so
you know and obviously Trump was quite lucky they didn't kill him and it probably was one
of the things that propelled him to power so I should think if you asked Donald Trump you know
would he have rather been shot in the ear or not he'd probably tell you yes I'd have rather been
shot in the ear because you know in American history there are certain moments where iconic
images are sort of taken and that picture of Trump you know forcing his way up through the Secret
putting his fist in the air with blood coming from his ear will go down in history, you know,
and everyone wants, you know, every politician wants to be in a situation like that where they
emerge victorious. So for him, it was probably a good thing. The resident Baker gave $5, thank
you so much for the evening mark. Very interesting guess on the subject of Trump and his relationship
with Israel and the Jewish lobby. Does Ron believe it is likely that Trump is being blackmailed,
or is he purely a coin operated and transactional person?
There certainly might be blackmail involved.
In other words, the Israel lobby has made efforts,
I mean, with the Jeffrey Epstein ring
and other things like that,
for decades to gain blackmail holds
over as many powerful American political figures as possible.
And I mean, Trump certainly might be under pressure that way,
but it's also possible.
I mean, what the Israel lobby has successfully done
is ensure that almost all of the political leaders
and advisors,
in the Republican Party and in the Trump administration
are aligned with their interests.
Furthermore, the media obviously is totally under control
of the Israel lobby, you know, both the right-wing media
and the left-wing media and the mainstream media.
I mean, whether it's New York Times or Fox News.
So, you know, if you're someone like Donald Trump
who doesn't really have a good knowledge of the world
and all of your advisors are lined up on a certain position,
and when you watch fox news or you know even if you take a look at some of the more mainstream
things maybe in the wall street journal in the new york times that also seems to be lined up in
the same position if all the people talking to you are telling you the same thing about a subject
I mean that by itself might be enough to get you to take steps that Israel wants but that would be utter disaster for the United States.
I mean, for example, it's quite possible that Trump has been told by CIA officials.
That you know the wet that Iran's and air defenses were severely damaged by the Israeli attack before
That the Iranian missiles don't work that it would be a cakewalk for America to attack Iran and
Devastate the country so you know again if all of these experts in the CIA and
Trump's advisors tell him that I mean he might believe it. I mean for example take Trump's defense secretary has eggs bet
I mean, basically, he doesn't know anything about the stuff.
He was basically just a pundit on Fox TV.
I mean, again, you're talking about just some random pundit on Fox TV who has suddenly
made defense secretary of the United States.
So I mean, where does he get his information?
You know, I mean, it's sort of, he probably gets it from like people who are in the pay
of the Israel lobby.
I was just googling another one because one that really amused me was, um...
A guy called Dan Bongino.
Oh, exactly. Bongino, right.
Yeah, like, I've got nothing against Dan Bongino,
but I always see his streams pop up on Rumble.
And it's like, oh, who's Dan Bongino?
He's doing a stream on Rumble.
He gets really big numbers.
He seems quite popular.
And the next minute, he's like head of the FBI or something.
Exactly.
It's insane.
I mean, it's just totally...
What are we talking about?
It's sort of like just...
you know, it's sort of like, basically, if Trump had watched your podcast and said,
I would like to be head of the FBI. But it's what you're expecting, kind of like.
You know when you see these sort of badly run South American sort of oil rich sort of dictatorships
There's someone who fixed the great leader's car and did him a good deal when he was 16
Which helped him pull the girl that's now his wife. He's like, I never forget you
My car you know in charge of farming
Kind of felt with Dambon and this is nothing against Dambon Gino but
I was kind of like, who is he?
Why is he getting these big views over on Rumble?
They're really pushing him.
And the next minute he's like second in command of the FBI.
And it's like, he obviously said all the right things
about Trump when Trump happened to be watching Rumble one day.
And I should have written a really nice book about Trump
just in the sort of, you know,
if you're like buying a lottery ticket,
you're probably not going to win.
But, you know, on the off chance
that he picks your book up and likes it,
you've got a job, you know, until he's,
like, you know, it's like being in Nero, it's got to least ours of you and then it's off your head.
It's very entertaining. Thin Red Line gave $10. Thank you so much for my friend. He said,
Mr. Unz, most of the Jewish billionaires have supported Trump in the last election. Do you
think they'll return to supporting the Democrats in the next election, or do you think it's a
permanent shift to the right amongst the billionaire class?
Well, I mean, the billionaires, including almost all of the Jewish billionaires, had been totally opposed to Trump during his first term when he ran in 2016, and when he ran for reelection 2020.
I think the key factor that shifted them around was the Hamas attack on Israel, because it basically focused all of the Jewish billionaires, or very large number of them, on the Israel issue as being absolutely central and most important.
And since Trump was even more pro-Israel
than the Biden administration,
which itself was very pro-Israel,
many of them gravitated towards Trump.
It hopes that Trump then would destroy
all of Israel's enemies, would attack Iran.
For example, Benjamin Netanyahu shifted his support
gradually towards Trump in hopes that Trump
would be even more supportive of his policies
than the Biden administration had been.
And I mean, Biden was incredibly supportive.
I mean, Biden's Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken.
I mean, but basically, Blinken, when he was a young man,
gave his extra bedroom to Benjamin Netanyahu
when he was visiting the United States.
So he has a long history.
being very very close to the hardline Israeli government and Israel's prime
minister but compared to the Democratic Party which had again some lower level
Democrats who were much more opposed to it was going on the Middle East. Trump was
even more pro-Israel so you know that shifted more of the Jewish building
areas and also Jewish activists towards Trump. The other factor also had been all
the Biden administration, even though it helped crack down on them, was not willing to take the
strong steps to suppress freedom of speech on American university campuses as the Trump
administration has been. So for all those reasons, I think without the Hamas attack on Israel on
That all these Jewish billionaires would have shifted over to Trump now
They probably would have still opposed him like they did the first time
I mean you might have won anyway, but it probably would have been much more difficult
Well, thank you. Why gave $10 thanks so much said run given the involvement of Israel and Jews in many of these pivotal
Conspiracies that have dramatically changed Western civilization. Do you have any thoughts on whether anti-Semitism is a justifiable reaction?
Well, again, it depends what you mean by anti-Semitism, in other words, nowadays, you know, the term anti-Semitism obviously means, you know, dislike or criticizing Jews or disliking Jews or that sort of thing.
And obviously, it can be taken to the extent of, you know, having views like that that are, you know, extremely strong or unreasonably strong.
actually is a form of anti-Semitism.
So in other words, they have said that anti-Semitism
is sort of the broader category,
but anti-Zionism is part of that.
And anti-Zionism similarly means disliking the state of Israel
or criticizing the state of Israel.
Now, I mean, the problem is,
over the last year and a half since the Hamas attack,
the state of Israel has committed a gigantic massacre.
of innocent men, women, and children in Gaza.
I mean, basically, they've killed at least tens of thousands,
possibly more like hundreds of thousands.
I mean, the International Court of Justice
in a series of near unanimous rulings,
many of them endorsed by the former Chief Justice
of the Israeli Supreme Court,
have declared that Israel is plausibly being accused
of committing genocide.
Now, most Westerners these days, you know, have a negative view of genocide.
They regard genocide as not being a good thing.
And so when the Israeli government has been accused of all these international, highly
regarded jurists of engaging in genocide against the innocent civilians of the West Bank of
Gaza.
Then I think criticizing the Israeli government or opposing the Israeli government seems a fairly reasonable position to take
But that constitutes anti-Zionism and anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism
So it comes down to if the pro-Israel lobby is right and anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism
Then either you support genocide or you have to be anti-Semitic and that you know
It's a very difficult Hobson's choice people are facing
Which is why most people keep silent as much as possible and avoid the issue
That's a very very good way of putting it. This is that is that is excellent. So thank you very much
$14 came from thin red line. Thank you so much. Mr. Unns. How large a percentage of the Jews in America?
Do you think support Israel's war in Gaza?
That's a good question. I mean the polls I've seen they vary and it varies also the time period you're talking about or when
You ask the question for example initially in the first few weeks after the attack
I think support among American Jews was probably in the 70% or 80% range.
In other words, you know, there was sort of all of the wagons were being circled.
And also, for example, there was all this massively dishonest propaganda.
accusing Hamas, for example, of beheading babies.
There were all those new stories
about the 40 beheaded babies,
babies baked in ovens, mass gang rapes,
and all of it turned out to be total nonsense.
In fact, the Israeli government itself refused
to sort of endorse those stories.
I mean, they were so ridiculous.
It was all just dishonest propaganda.
So, you know, as some of those facts started
to gradually come out,
And as more and more reports came out about the gigantic number of civilians being killed in Gaza,
you know, men, women and children, little babies being blown apart, and it circumvented the gatekeepers of the mainstream media.
In other words, if all one knew of what was going on in the Israeli attacks on Gaza came from the newspapers,
Very few people would be aware of these things, but because of social media, because of YouTube,
because of Elon Musk's Twitter, because of TikTok, people are seeing these horrific scenes.
so many dead civilians caused by the Israeli bombardment and these stories come out these horrible Israeli atrocities
Many of which are proudly broadcast by Israeli soldiers
They're the ones putting on on Twitter because they're so proud of the atrocities they're committing
So based on that the figures I've seen are that I think probably it's reached the point where close to a majority of
younger American Jews
The ones who get their information from TikTok and Twitter and YouTube are now being much
more critical of Israel and probably no longer supporting the attack. I think still probably
a majority of the older middle-aged American Jews who get their information from, you know,
CBS News and The New York Times might still be supporting it. So, you know, the numbers have
Over the last year and a half and so it might be now that it's a minority who still support Israeli policy
But it's certainly you know a very sizable number who still do
Thank you
It was made up, gave ten dollars, thank you so much, said how does Ron think things will
work out in the UK with regards to the uni-party free speech, two-tier policing and the political
track we seem to be in?
Does he think there will be some sort of collapse or will the anti-white regime just trundle
on?
I think at some point, I mean, there really might be a collapse of the political system
in so many of these West European countries. In other words, the British economy is in
terrible shape right now. Britain has so many problems. Starmer, for example, won a gigantic
landslide because the Conservatives were so unpopular. But the policies he's implemented
have been so unpopular, at least last time I saw any numbers reported. His numbers were,
So in other words, when both of the major parties, the traditional major parties in Britain, are so incredibly unpopular, it provides an opening for something like the reform party to come in.
And it's not clear to me whether the reform party would be so much different than these two major parties, but at least they're different than those two major parties, and maybe they would, you know, improve some of these things.
in all of these major West European countries and in the United States
have largely been captured by so many of these powerful lobbies.
Certainly the Israel lobby, but also the military contractor lobby,
the Wall Street lobby, so many of these different lobbies,
that almost none of the politicians have any independence.
In other words, you know, it's interesting, Obama, for example, when he was elected president,
was regarded as the absolute anti-George Bush.
He would totally overturn all of George Bush's policies.
The reason people voted for an almost unknown black guy
named Barack Hussein Obama was because Bush's policies
were so unpopular.
But once Obama came in,
he continued all of Bush's policies.
For example, he kept Bush's defense secretary.
He took one of Bush's top treasury officials and promoted him to run the
Treasury. He kept Bush's chairman of the Federal Reserve. So, you know, Obama's
administration became almost Bush's third term. And in the same way, for example,
the Biden administration was regarded as a total repudiation of Trump's policies,
but they've continued many of Trump's policies. The problem is, so many of the
political figures...
in all the parties not only in western Europe but in the United States
have been co-opted and in a sense bribed or intimidated or blackmailed
that they have almost no independence. Let me take for example Benjamin Netanyahu.
I mean he has an arrest warrant out for him as an accused war criminal.
I mean, he's been accused of committing genocide by the International Court of Justice.
He was incredibly unpopular in his own government of Israel.
He's accused of all sorts of corruption, and he was basically barely staying out of prison
in Israel.
He was given an unprecedented fifth chance to address a joint session of both houses of Congress.
And almost all the members of Congress gave him, I think there was something like 35 standing ovations more than anybody had ever received.
Clapping endlessly for this accused war criminal with an international arrest warrant out for him.
And that's because virtually every member of Congress is bought and paid for by the Israel Abbey.
In fact, Thomas Massey, one of the very, very few honest members of Congress, was on Tucker
Carlson some months ago and explained that every member of Congress
Has an Israel basically an Israel a gatekeeper an Israel follower who basically an Israel minder
Who basically looks after him and tells him how to vote on all these issues?
I mean, it's really just bizarre when you know every elected official in the United States has all these people behind them
Not only that
But when any of them deviate from these policies, for example, a couple of the most radical Black members of the Black Caucus who'd won in heavily Black districts with overwhelming support,
they ended up actually coming out and supporting a ceasefire in Gaza at one point in a very mild sort of way.
$8 million and $16 million to drive them from office, to have them defeated on their own primaries.
More than anybody ever spent on a congressional primary, both of them were defeated.
Some of the truth is, in the United States today, elected officials note that if they are viewed as
insufficiently loyal to a foreign country and a foreign government, they'll be quickly removed from office.
And I mean, that's not the sort of thing you find in political history textbooks, political
science textbooks, that our government is run by people who know that unless they're sufficiently
loyal to a foreign country, they'll immediately be removed from their position.
And that's why the country's in the terrible mess it's in.
And that's why there's certainly at least a reasonable chance that Donald Trump will
that will be an utter disaster for both America and the world.
I mean, we'll destroy the Middle East and destroy the global economy.
Thank you very much a Jagdeep Jain I gave $15. Thank you so much said hey both
Could I get your thoughts on pizza gate Comet ping pong James
Alifantis the Podesta brothers and the
2016 WikiLeaks publishing of Democrat emails many believe it points to a network of abuse with ties to the occult
If so, how significant is this? Yeah, I've actually written some articles on it
I mean at the time the pizza gate thing came up
I guess it was about five or six years ago.
You know, by now, it must be closer to eight years ago.
I really didn't pay any attention to that,
but then when I saw a few of those stories floating around.
Some of the issues were so bizarre, and the media coverage was so outrageous.
In other words, it was sort of like flashing a bright neon sign saying,
nothing to see here.
The first cancellations that had ever taken place on YouTube,
the first time people were ever dropped from YouTube,
not for saying something that was unpermitted,
but simply for saying controversial things,
was at the time of the pizza gate controversy. So I've actually written some articles saying
that I think there's a very high likelihood the pizza gate story basically was true.
And you know I've discussed I've analyzed in some of my articles. And what it points to is,
again, blackmail is one of the key tools for controlling elected political officials. It has been
for many, many decades, not only with the Israel lobby, but most strongly with the Israel lobby,
with Jeffrey Epstein and everything like that. So, I mean, we're talking what nowadays, for
example, traditionally people were blackmail, if they were, for example, it was if it was discovered,
say that they were gay, that they were homosexual, you know, like J. Edgar Hoover, apparently,
had photographs showing him, you know, in
homosexual activity, and that was why organized crime was able to prevent him from ever, you know,
trying to uproot organized crime in the United States. The problem blackmailers face right now
is that so many of these things have now been legalized and are considered proper activity.
I mean, if the head of the FBI now were found to be, you know, gay, were found to be homosexual,
being something that would strengthen his political possession. So that means
blackmailers have to turn to tools that are still considered so horrific.
They can be held over the heads of politicians and certainly, you know, but being involved with underage children as
Pizzagate allegedly was I mean being basically a child muster a pedophile is exactly that sort of weapon
So in other words, it's exactly the sort of tool that would be used
Nowadays in American society to control powerful
Politicians who can't be controlled in any other way in other words when you're talking about a political leader right now
Many of them, you know, have used insider trading and other things like that to become very wealthy, so you can't control them with money.
You can't control them under most circumstances with media if they're powerful in the media. So the tool that's used to control them is obviously blackmail.
And when you're looking for ways of blackmailing people, I think pedophilia is one of the few remaining holds available.
In fact, I've sometimes joked in some of my articles that, you know, if you're somebody who's a rising politician,
who wants to really become an important political figure in our society,
maybe the best thing you can do is to commit some horrific crime, have it all videotaped.
And then make sure that videotape gets in the hands of certain powerful people in American society.
Because with that videotape in their hands, they would know that they control you.
And they would certainly do everything you could to advance your political career.
And a perfect example of that is John McCain.
I mean, John McCain, when you look at his background, it's unbelievable.
I mean, the things in his background that have been documented.
That clearly were being used to control him and blackmail him
I mean certainly explain why he was so incredibly popular with the media and why so many efforts were made to give him
Powerful positions in American society and so you know again
You might want to take a look at the articles I've written on pizza gate
But I went through all that stuff connected pizza gate with John McCain's blackmail
and with the Jeffrey Epstein ring, and I think they're a complete continuity,
and that's why I think there's a very good chance pizza gate is probably true.
I also agree, I think there was so much stuff.
in those emails and those people were also doing weird things and when I say weird things, it's like, you know, I suppose everyone throughout their life does something that sort of risqué or odd or that they look back on and think, God, what did I do that for?
But when you saw some of the parties that those people were attending, where they were doing that weird spirit cooking and those people lying in baths like congealed blood pretending to be dead as people spooned into their mouths, you know,
and these people were doing that as if it was normal you know if I walk if you know if me and
my family work we're going for a day out there's an art exhibition you know at the local gallery
and we turned up and there was a naked woman pretending to be dead and we were told to
you know spoon some syrupy blood off our body and eat it we'd be kind of like yeah this isn't for us
It's back away, but all these people are like,
oh, let's have another spoon of the blood.
What?
What do you people think this is normal?
So when you see that going on
and they don't mind being photographed doing that,
you have to ask, what would be the stuff that they do
that they don't want to be photographed doing?
And that's always a step beyond,
because I don't want to be photographed
at one of those spirit cooking.
I'd be like, no, I'm leaving this.
It's weird.
I don't want to have anything to do with it.
But if they will be photographed doing that,
what's the stuff that they do behind closed doors? So I think there is probably a lot of truth to
that. And the way the media was desperate to sort of shut it down as well, the certain things that
the media, you know, you can get away with saying on sort of certain platforms and sort of more sort
This planet is actually an alien tree farm, and all mountains are tree stumps that have already been harvested,
and we're just insects waiting for the next harvest.
And there's loads of videos like that. No one's taken them down, and I'm sure if that was true, the videos would be taken down.
But Petergate was very quickly stomped upon.
Ron's American Prada series has become a central reading.
I look forward to each new article released every Sunday.
Special thanks to Ron for providing audio versions.
Bravo, bravo, bravo, bravo.
Thank you so much.
Glenn 19.
I gave two dollars. Thank you very much said mr. Ones. Do you believe Israel should be destroyed?
This can be done simply by a one-state solution. I believe Zionism is not only not nationalism
But the antithesis to it its goal is to destroy other than all other nations
Well, I mean Israel really has such a horrible criminal record right now
I mean, you know again take for example the I mean a very thoroughly document take for example build attack on the USS
almost 60 years ago, an American vessel sailing in international waters.
was attacked in an unprovoked way by the Israeli military,
who killed or wounded more than 200 American servicemen.
And it was all covered up by the American government.
I mean, they intended to kill everybody in the ship,
sink it with no survivors.
Now, if you're the United States,
you know, the most powerful nation in the world,
if somebody attacks your ship,
kills your servicemen. It was the greatest naval loss of life America had suffered since the Second World War.
Under normal circumstances, America's retaliation would have been so overwhelming.
That other countries in the world would have learned a lesson not to do something like that
But instead the American government under Lyndon Johnson was so heavily
Coopted and controlled by the Israeli government that we covered up the entire thing. In fact the surviving servicemen
Were more or less almost threatened with death if they ever told the story so it took about 10 or 15 years until the story even came out
It's all totally documented right now. Nobody can deny it
But I mean what we're talking about when a country goes around and attacks the ships of the most powerful nation on earth
And does things like that repeatedly, and probably was involved in the assassination of JFK, as we discussed at the beginning?
I mean, we're talking about a country that is behaving in such an incredibly reckless way
that at some point, one of those examples of recklessness will probably come through.
Take, for example, the attack on Iran.
Iran possesses an enormous arsenal.
long-range ballistic missiles, including hypersonic missiles. When they were
exchanging attacks with Israel, it's clear that Israel's anti-missile
defenses had no chance of stopping most of these Iranian missiles. Iranian
missiles hit exactly where they were aimed. So, I mean, we're talking about if
America attacks Iran and begins, you know, severely damaging the country,
I think there's a very good chance if the Iranians feel that they're going down, they
would unleash their missiles and destroy Israel.
I mean, for example, one thing that people pointed out is the Iranians don't have a nuclear
weapon, but their missiles could be used to destroy the Demona nuclear reactor in Israel,
releasing all the radioactivity, which would basically destroy the state of Israel.
So, I mean, again, with the Israeli government under Benjamin Netanyahu doing everything
possible to persuade America to launch an all-out war against Iran, the result of that
might be the destruction of Iran, the destruction of the United States, but very likely also
the destruction of Israel.
Regarding a political solution in the Middle East, it's a very difficult problem.
I, you know, again, I really not paid, it's not a subject I feel I have a great
deal of expertise in, but seems to me most of the people I know who seem to
know that region well and have a good knowledge of it do believe that probably
a one-state solution.
with the Palestinians and the Israelis living together,
probably is the best possible option.
I mean, it's very clear that the current system doesn't work.
And that, you know, again, I mean, the fact
that the Israelis maintained a siege of Gaza
for about 10 years, refusing to let any food or medicine,
almost any food or medicine into the place,
which, you know, provoked the Hamas raid
that, you know, started all this thing.
I mean, that's really just an outrageous situation.
And now the Israelis, for example, under Netanyahu, are trying to use this opportunity to perform an ethnic cleansing of the West Bank, to drive out all the Palestinians from the Gaza area and the West Bank and the neighboring countries, and then settle all of it with Israeli settlers.
So, I mean, it's just really, the Israeli government is not only.
doing things like massacres and genocides and atrocities that are very evil, but they're also very very stupid in other words
It's so self-destructive a policy on the point of the Israeli government if the Israeli government were run by very evil people
But less self-destructive and stupid people, they certainly wouldn't be doing what they're doing right now.
So, you know, again, if a war breaks out in the Middle East involving Iran, I think there's a very good chance the end result of it would be a bombardment of so many Israeli missile, Iranian missiles towards Israel.
It would mean the destruction of the state of Israel.
That's very interesting take Glenn 19 gave another doll and he said every Jew that finds their way into Japan only ends up undermining it
Jake Adelstein and his work dramatically reducing the power of the jacuzza were big funders of nationalist groups now with Noah
Smith and his recent book weeb economy only in Japanese makes the case that who is that that
the Japanese people must change.
Well, thank you for that.
Finn Redleige, five dollars.
Thank you so much.
And he says, Mr.
Ums, why is it that Jews want to destroy
national cohesion in all of the nations?
Is it simply a case of competition or is there something else behind this?
Well, it's probably a mixture of various different things.
In other words, obviously, you know, if you're a cohesive, very small minority,
like a Jewish group,
One thing that could obviously be very problematic for you and your influence in society is if the large majority began to become more cohesive itself.
So in other words, there's obviously a strong incentive for a small cohesive group to try to weaken the cohesion.
of the larger groups in society so that they can compete more effectively.
And the truth is also, for example, you know, a lot of
the history of Jewish activity in the world
has been very biased and one-sided. So for example, a lot of Jews, probably
than a very large majority of Jews,
believe things about the history of the world that simply are not really true
or very, very one-sided. In other words,
you know, if Jews and non-Jews, like for example Jews and Palestinians,
have been involved in tit for tat actions over the years.
But if the media presents a very one-sided propagandistic
approach, many Jews might have a very distorted
view of the situation.
So for example, in the United States,
probably a certain fraction of Jews.
have a view that non-Jewish white Americans oppressed them, mistreated them,
tried to destroy them in ways that really much more propagandistic than real.
And so much of these Jewish actions against, for example, a white majority population
might be viewed by the Jews involved, the more sort of agitated Jews, as being retaliation.
But it's retaliation probably for many events that never really occurred or that were very much distorted.
In other words, you know, it's the sort of thing when two countries are at war.
There's often a lot of propaganda on both sides.
In other words, each side's military troops are told that they were in the right.
They are being mistreated horribly.
They are suffering the atrocities on the other side.
It's obviously a way to motivate your own side and make them much more coherent.
dedicated to each other in the competition with the other side. So I think to some extent,
you know, even though we're talking about a situation that isn't involving explicit warfare,
there is a certain amount of ethnic warfare going on in countries. And ethnic warfare
sometimes uses the same tools of propaganda and media that actual physical kinetic warfare does.
So that's probably much of what's really been involved.
Well, thank you very much. Ghost Dogman gave $2 and said donation. Thank you very much.
And Sally gave $5 and said, thank you, Mark and Ron. Well, thank you so much.
My dear Hoyt gave $25 and said donation. Thank you very much.
And Jay Bradley gave $15. Thank you so much.
And said, Johnson's was in the pockets of the Jews.
He covered up the attack on the USS Liberty by Israeli killing 130-plus Americans.
They're responsible for more white deaths.
we shouldn't be afraid to say it. Well thank you so much for that Jay and we covered that issue a
few moments ago. Well that brings us to the end of the Super Chess and to the end of the show
and I'd just like to say a huge thank you to Ron for joining us. Ron you've been an amazing guest
and this has been like you're sort of like talking to an encyclopedia it's fascinating and your
answers have probably you know I could have probably gone for another couple of hours but
we're not going to do that but thank you so much for being here would you like to have the final
word before I shut things down?
Well, thanks very much for having me. It's certainly very interesting to discuss these issues
and present them in a way that hopefully will get the word out. And regarding, for example,
the original subject of the talk, the assassination of John F. Kennedy, I mean, I think it's very
important that some of these ideas be much more widely presented on the internet. And it's unfortunate
to get anywhere near this issue. So I certainly appreciate the fact that you've given me this platform.
Well, thank you so much. It's been a great great show. Um, I would always love to work with you again
And I'm sure if anything big comes up, I will be inviting you back to talk about it. It's been
Wonderful, um, I just like to say a huge. Thank you to Ron and I'd also like to say
Thank you to everyone who donated so very generously and also another massive
Thank you to everyone who was part of this show whether you were one of the
4 to 500 people who tuned in live or whether you're one of the people who shared it donated
whatever you did to help it to get on its way.
Thank you so much.
I'll be back same time next week with Mike Enoch from TRS.
And I'll be back later this week
with the National State Team on Sunday, Sunday,
pre-recorded video on...
Friday we've got one last super chat from scaredy cat who said hi Ron and mark best wishes for eight dollars
Thank you so much and that does bring us to the end of the show
And if you want to make a donation after the show is finished
You can continue doing that through Odyssey by hitting the donate button at any time or you can send money via the crypto links
Thank you so much everyone. Thank you to Ron. Thank you to everyone who donated and most of all
Thank you to everyone who's part of this wonderful community. Love you all have a great night
And I'll see you same time next week for another episode of patriotic weekly review. Thank you everybody and good night