WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.600
Josh, I want to throw this image up. This is from the New York Magazine. It's kind of

00:00:05.600 --> 00:00:12.180
personal for me, actually. Throw up 94, image 94. The Cruel Kids Table is the way the headline

00:00:12.180 --> 00:00:19.520
reads. This is a cover piece for New York Magazine by Brock Collier, who is a transjournalist

00:00:20.040 --> 00:00:26.060
from the New York Magazine. I know this because Brock also applied for press credentials at

00:00:28.020 --> 00:00:33.860
ball, our inaugural Eve ball and was there on the red carpet. There's pictures of our ball

00:00:33.860 --> 00:00:39.860
at in this story. But the pushback is hilarious about this piece, but I think it's an interesting

00:00:39.860 --> 00:00:44.700
and even the journalist in this piece, Josh, admits that we're winning.

00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:50.080
that we are culturally ascendant, that we are now dominating realms of culture that

00:00:50.080 --> 00:00:53.320
would have been hard to fathom just a few years ago.

00:00:54.000 --> 00:00:59.500
And I believe that they've cropped this picture to make it look more racist, like it's only

00:00:59.500 --> 00:01:00.600
white kids or something.

00:01:00.880 --> 00:01:05.580
There's a whole bunch of that going on here, but it's like, Josh, take this picture as

00:01:05.580 --> 00:01:06.240
just one instance.

00:01:10.090 --> 00:01:17.270
at a trendy cocktail party. And I guess if that's cruel, celebrating the dawn of a new

00:01:17.270 --> 00:01:24.330
administration, a new America, I guess cry harder libs as my instant reaction.

00:01:24.690 --> 00:01:27.250
What do you make of this? And what does this tell us?

00:01:28.730 --> 00:01:32.850
Well, first of all, Andrew, I'm pretty sure they did do exactly that, which you said they

00:01:32.850 --> 00:01:37.350
did, which is that they cropped out this photo they edited it, they photoshopped it to make

00:01:37.350 --> 00:01:39.830
it look just more monolithically white than it is there.

00:01:40.170 --> 00:01:45.570
But I think a normal American looks at this photo, whether it's been photoshopped or cropped

00:01:45.570 --> 00:01:49.650
or edited or not, and says, wow, these are a bunch of like pretty-

00:01:50.060 --> 00:01:54.420
good looking young people having a great time. They're dressed nicely there, they're clanking

00:01:54.420 --> 00:01:58.520
their glasses, they're saying cheers there. I'm sorry, I'm not seeing anything wrong with this

00:01:58.520 --> 00:02:03.240
picture, Andrew. I'm simply just not seeing anything. And I think the broader point is

00:02:03.240 --> 00:02:06.780
getting at here. This is a point that I've made actually for a few years now.

00:02:07.310 --> 00:02:12.690
I think this is part of the left's war on fun. I actually literally call the war on fun.

00:02:13.130 --> 00:02:18.650
Whether it's trying to call you a scold for driving in a gas guzzling pickup truck or an SUV,

00:02:19.050 --> 00:02:22.350
whether they're calling you a bad person for wanting to have numerous kids,

00:02:22.850 --> 00:02:25.830
that whole be fruitful and multiply thing right there from the book of Genesis.

00:02:26.030 --> 00:02:30.230
God forbid you actually take God at his word and have three, four, five,

00:02:30.410 --> 00:02:34.830
God knows how many children who are gonna consume oxygen and spit out carbon dioxide.

00:02:36.750 --> 00:02:41.850
person, they definitely hate that, Andrew. God forbid you actually teach your children

00:02:41.850 --> 00:02:45.530
about religion, about the Bible, about the things that actually built this country,

00:02:45.590 --> 00:02:47.870
about the founding fathers, about the Constitutional Convention.

00:02:48.250 --> 00:02:51.370
You can't have any of that either there. I mean, the left has become just

00:02:51.370 --> 00:02:57.710
these pearl clutching bunch of overtly faux moralistic prima donnas. That's basically what

00:02:57.710 --> 00:03:00.470
they become there. And they hate looking at anyone.

00:03:00.910 --> 00:03:04.850
who is more successful than them. That obviously gets back to the roots of socialism and Marxism

00:03:04.850 --> 00:03:09.530
is this whole idea of envy and class envy and individual envy. That's definitely part of this

00:03:09.530 --> 00:03:15.010
as well there. But they're just fundamentally just a bunch of red tag. And frankly, Andrew,

00:03:15.110 --> 00:03:19.330
if I'm just being very blunt for a second here, I was looking at this at this rally on the eve

00:03:19.330 --> 00:03:23.690
of the inauguration, the left wing rally there with kind of those pink hats, whatever the women's

00:03:25.440 --> 00:03:28.360
bunch of ugly people. I mean, I'm probably gonna get in trouble for saying that there,

00:03:28.420 --> 00:03:32.900
but these are just typically their exceptions, but a bunch of very ugly people, honestly.

00:03:33.820 --> 00:03:39.920
Josh, I mean, think about it. And I think Matt Walsh made this point on Twitter. We like Matt a

00:03:39.920 --> 00:03:47.920
lot, and he had a great role to play in just his film and so many other things. But what reads

00:03:54.770 --> 00:04:00.930
many obese or at least overweight, young people screaming about some injustice that they've

00:04:00.930 --> 00:04:02.870
invented in a college laboratory.

00:04:03.410 --> 00:04:10.190
I mean, literally, if young kids having fun, if young kids wearing a flannel in the country,

00:04:10.770 --> 00:04:14.770
listening to country music, whatever, I mean, we are the fun movement.

00:04:14.930 --> 00:04:18.470
And it's a very fascinating point, Josh, and we'll throw it back to you for 30 seconds

00:04:20.640 --> 00:04:22.060
It seemed like in 2008 this

00:04:22.060 --> 00:04:23.420
cultural ascendancy of the left

00:04:23.420 --> 00:04:25.240
promised all of these things, but

00:04:25.240 --> 00:04:26.040
failed to deliver.

00:04:26.180 --> 00:04:27.440
Instead, it delivered this

00:04:28.040 --> 00:04:30.430
dystopian puritanical scolding

00:04:32.120 --> 00:04:34.640
from the left about these invented

00:04:34.640 --> 00:04:35.520
injustices.

00:04:36.040 --> 00:04:38.080
And this movement, I believe, can

00:04:38.080 --> 00:04:40.540
actually deliver on the promise of

00:04:40.540 --> 00:04:43.000
lifting everybody and having fun.

00:04:43.420 --> 00:04:44.780
Final reaction, Josh Hammer.

00:04:45.410 --> 00:04:53.970
Well, you're totally right to take it back to 2008 and that's where I started in my cold civil wars over op-ed too because it does go back to Barack Obama in his 2008 campaign.

00:04:54.170 --> 00:04:59.570
Andrew, if the left is going to have any chance of recovering and thank God it's not my problem, I'm a man of the right, obviously.

00:05:00.050 --> 00:05:07.250
But if the left is going to have any chance of recovering here, Andrew, they have to disavow the entirety of the Barack Obama legacy and his post presidential legacy.

00:05:07.370 --> 00:05:14.610
They need to go back to the old Democratic Party of Bill Clinton and his predecessors who, whatever their flaws were, they were focused on bread and butter.

00:05:14.860 --> 00:05:15.700
issues, not this woke rep.